Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347099›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A dynamic visualization clinical tool constructed and validated based on the SEER database for screening the optimal surgical candidates for bone metastasis in primary kidney cancer.

Liming Jiang, Yuexin Tong, Jun Wang, Jiajia Jiang, Yan Gong, Dejin Zhu, Linyang Zheng, Dongxu Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Liming JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Yuexin TongDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Jun WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Rizhao People's Hospital, Rizhao, 276800, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jiajia JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Yan GongDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Dejin ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Linyang ZhengDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China.
Dongxu ZhaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, 130033, Jilin, People's Republic of China. dxzhao@jlu.edu.cn.
Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CNPeople’s Hospital of Rizhao · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the treatment of kidney cancer patients (KC) with bone metastases (BM) has been controversial. This study aims to construct the first tool that can accurately predict the likelihood of PTR benefit in KC patients with BM (KCBM) and select the optimal surgical candidates. This study acquired data on all patients diagnosed with KCBM during 2010-2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to achieve balanced matching of PTR and non-PTR groups to eliminate selection bias and confounding factors. The median overall survival (OS) of the non-PTR group was used as the threshold to categorize the PTR group into PTR-beneficial and PTR-Nonbeneficial subgroups. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was used for comparison of survival differences and median OS between groups. Risk factors associated with PTR-beneficial were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to validate the predictive performance and clinical utility of the nomogram. Ultimately, 1963 KCBM patients meeting screening criteria were recruited. Of these, 962 patients received PTR and the remaining 1061 patients did not receive PTR. After 1:1 PSM, there were 308 patients in both PTR and non-PTR groups. The K-M survival analysis results showed noteworthy survival disparities between PTR and non-PTR groups, both before and after PSM (p < 0.001). In the logistic regression results of the PTR group, histological type, T/N stage and lung metastasis were shown to be independent risk factors associated with PTR-beneficial. The web-based nomogram allows clinicians to enter risk variables directly and quickly obtain PTR beneficial probabilities. The validation results showed the excellent predictive performance and clinical utility of the nomograms for accurate screening of optimal surgical candidates for KCBM. This study constructed an easy-to-use nomogram based on conventional clinicopathologic variables to accurately select the optimal surgical candidates for KCBM patients.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsKidney NeoplasmsArea Under CurveEarly Detection of CancerHumansNomogramsPrognosisPropensity ScoreSEER ProgramBone metastasisKidney cancerOptimal surgical candidatesPrimary tumor resectionSEER database

Identifiers

PMID38347099
PMCPMC10861469
OpenAlexW4391743153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.