Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347098›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Translating color fundus photography to indocyanine green angiography using deep-learning for age-related macular degeneration screening.

Ruoyu Chen, Weiyi Zhang, Fan Song, Honghua Yu, Dan Cao, Yingfeng Zheng, Mingguang He, Danli Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Applications of generative adversarial networks in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ophthalmic diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruoyu Chen *Experimental Ophthalmology, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-9056
Weiyi Zhang *Experimental Ophthalmology, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2780-9121
Fan SongExperimental Ophthalmology, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Honghua YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingfeng ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China. zhyfeng@mail.sysu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-7864
Mingguang HeExperimental Ophthalmology, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. mingguang.he@polyu.edu.hk.
Danli ShiExperimental Ophthalmology, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. danli.shi@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6094-137X
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HKGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of central vision impairment among the elderly. Effective and accurate AMD screening tools are urgently needed. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is a well-established technique for detecting chorioretinal diseases, but its invasive nature and potential risks impede its routine clinical application. Here, we innovatively developed a deep-learning model capable of generating realistic ICGA images from color fundus photography (CF) using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and evaluated its performance in AMD classification. The model was developed with 99,002 CF-ICGA pairs from a tertiary center. The quality of the generated ICGA images underwent objective evaluation using mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity measures (SSIM), etc., and subjective evaluation by two experienced ophthalmologists. The model generated realistic early, mid and late-phase ICGA images, with SSIM spanned from 0.57 to 0.65. The subjective quality scores ranged from 1.46 to 2.74 on the five-point scale (1 refers to the real ICGA image quality, Kappa 0.79-0.84). Moreover, we assessed the application of translated ICGA images in AMD screening on an external dataset (n = 13887) by calculating area under the ROC curve (AUC) in classifying AMD. Combining generated ICGA with real CF images improved the accuracy of AMD classification with AUC increased from 0.93 to 0.97 (P < 0.001). These results suggested that CF-to-ICGA translation can serve as a cross-modal data augmentation method to address the data hunger often encountered in deep-learning research, and as a promising add-on for population-based AMD screening. Real-world validation is warranted before clinical usage.

Identifiers

PMID38347098
PMCPMC10861476
OpenAlexW4391751464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.