Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347019›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Lytic activity of phages against bacterial pathogens infecting diabetic foot ulcers.

Legesse Garedew Kifelew, Morgyn S Warner, Sandra Morales, David L Gordon, Nicky Thomas, James G Mitchell, Peter G Speck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. mBio · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Complete genome sequence of a methicillin-resistantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Legesse Garedew KifelewCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia. legesse.kifelew@flinders.edu.au.
Morgyn S WarnerInfectious Diseases Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
Sandra MoralesAmpliPhi Australia Pty Ltd., Brookvale, NSW, 2100, Australia.
David L GordonDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Nicky ThomasBasil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, Woodville South, SA, 5011, Australia.
James G MitchellCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Peter G SpeckCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia. peter.speck@flinders.edu.au.
Flinders University · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications of diabetes, such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), are common, multifactorial in origin, and costly to treat. DFUs are the cause of nearly 90% of limb amputations among persons with diabetes. In most chronic infections such as DFU, biofilms are involved. Bacteria in biofilms are 100-1000 times more resistant to antibiotics than their planktonic counterparts. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in DFUs may require alternative therapeutic agents such as bacteriophages ("phages"). This study describes the lytic activity of phage cocktails AB-SA01 (3-phage cocktail) and AB-PA01 (4-phage cocktail), which target S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively. The host range and lytic effect of AB-SA01 and AB-PA01 on a planktonic culture, single-species biofilm, and mixed-species biofilm were evaluated. In vitro testing showed that 88.7% of S. aureus and 92.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to AB-SA01 and AB-PA01, respectively, in the planktonic state. The component phages of AB-SA01 and AB-PA01 infected 66% to 94.3% of the bacterial isolates tested. Furthermore, AB-SA01 and AB-PA01 treatment significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the biofilm biomass of their hosts, regardless of the antibiotic-resistant characteristics of the isolates and the presence of a non-susceptible host. In conclusion, the strong lytic activity, broad host range, and significant biofilm biomass reduction of AB-SA01 and AB-PA01 suggest the considerable potential of phages in treating antibiotic-resistant S. aureus and P. aeruginosa infections alone or as coinfections in DFUs.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesDiabetes MellitusDiabetic FootMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsHumansStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38347019
PMCPMC10861545
OpenAlexW4391766866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.