Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347017›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Navigating the nuances: comparative analysis and hyperparameter optimisation of neural architectures on contrast-enhanced MRI for liver and liver tumour segmentation.

Felix Quinton, Benoit Presles, Sarah Leclerc, Guillaume Nodari, Olivier Lopez, Olivier Chevallier, Julie Pellegrinelli, Jean-Marc Vrigneaud, Romain Popoff, Fabrice Meriaudeau and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Felix QuintonInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France. felix.quinton@u-bourgogne.fr.
Benoit PreslesInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Sarah LeclercInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Guillaume NodariService de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 21000, Dijon, France.
Olivier LopezService de Radiologie et Imagerie Medicale Diagnostique et Therapeutique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France.
Olivier ChevallierService de Radiologie et Imagerie Medicale Diagnostique et Therapeutique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 21000, Dijon, France.
Julie PellegrinelliService de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, 21000, Dijon, France.
Jean-Marc VrigneaudInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Romain PopoffInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Fabrice MeriaudeauInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Jean-Louis AlberiniInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne, ICMUB UMR CNRS 6302, Université Bourgogne, 21000, Dijon, France.
Centre Georges François Leclerc · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne · FRInstitut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de BourgogneUniversité de Bourgogne · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE45-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical imaging, accurate segmentation is crucial to improving diagnosis, treatment, or both. However, navigating the multitude of available architectures for automatic segmentation can be overwhelming, making it challenging to determine the appropriate type of architecture and tune the most crucial parameters during dataset optimisation. To address this problem, we examined and refined seven distinct architectures for segmenting the liver, as well as liver tumours, with a restricted training collection of 60 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images (CE-MRI) from the ATLAS dataset. Included in these architectures are convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transformers, and hybrid CNN/transformer architectures. Bayesian search techniques were used for hyperparameter tuning to hasten convergence to the optimal parameter mixes while also minimising the number of trained models. It was unexpected that hybrid models, which typically exhibit superior performance on larger datasets, would exhibit comparable performance to CNNs. The optimisation of parameters contributed to better segmentations, resulting in an average increase of 1.7% and 5.0% in liver and tumour segmentation Dice coefficients, respectively. In conclusion, the findings of this study indicate that hybrid CNN/transformer architectures may serve as a practical substitute for CNNs even in small datasets. This underscores the significance of hyperparameter optimisation.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsBayes TheoremHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID38347017
PMCPMC10861452
OpenAlexW4391745181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.