Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Risk factors affecting patients survival with colorectal cancer in Morocco: survival analysis using an interpretable machine learning approach.

Imad El Badisy, Zineb BenBrahim, Mohamed Khalis, Soukaina Elansari, Youssef ElHitmi, Fouad Abbass, Nawfal Mellas, Karima El Rhazi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Advancements in Cancer Survival Prediction: A Systematic Review of Classical and Modern Approaches.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imad El BadisyMohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco. ielbadisy@um6ss.ma.
Zineb BenBrahimFaculty of Medicine, Pharmacy & Dental Medicine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdillah University, Fez, Morocco.
Mohamed KhalisMohammed VI Center for Research and Innovation, Rabat, Morocco.
Soukaina ElansariDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Youssef ElHitmiDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Fouad AbbassLaboratory of Epidemiology and Research in Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdillah University, Fez, Morocco.
Nawfal MellasDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Karima El RhaziLaboratory of Epidemiology and Research in Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdillah University, Fez, Morocco.

Funding

Moffitt Cancer Center under the NIH International Fogarty Center 5D43TW009804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess the overall survival rates for colorectal cancer at 3 years and to identify associated strong prognostic factors among patients in Morocco through an interpretable machine learning approach. This approach is based on a fully non-parametric survival random forest (RSF), incorporating variable importance and partial dependence effects. The data was povided from a retrospective study of 343 patients diagnosed and followed at Hassan II University Hospital. Covariate selection was performed using the variable importance based on permutation and partial dependence plots were displayed to explore in depth the relationship between the estimated partial effect of a given predictor and survival rates. The predictive performance was measured by two metrics, the Concordance Index (C-index) and the Brier Score (BS). Overall survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were, respectively, 87% (SE = 0.02; CI-95% 0.84-0.91), 77% (SE = 0.02; CI-95% 0.73-0.82) and 60% (SE = 0.03; CI-95% 0.54-0.66). In the Cox model after adjustment for all covariates, sex, tumor differentiation had no significant effect on prognosis, but rather tumor site had a significant effect. The variable importance obtained from RSF strengthens that surgery, stage, insurance, residency, and age were the most important prognostic factors. The discriminative capacity of the Cox PH and RSF was, respectively, 0.771 and 0.798 for the C-index while the accuracy of the Cox PH and RSF was, respectively, 0.257 and 0.207 for the BS. This shows that RSF had both better discriminative capacity and predictive accuracy. Our results show that patients who are older than 70, living in rural areas, without health insurance, at a distant stage and who have not had surgery constitute a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsInsurance, HealthHumansMachine LearningMoroccoRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38346963
PMCPMC10861582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.