Observational studyBMJ open2024
Overall survival of homebound patients without cancer receiving inpatient respite care in a hospital ward in Japan: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the relationship between the use of inpatient respite care and the overall survival of homebound patients without cancer admitted to a hospital ward in order to assess the potential impact of inpatient respite care on the duration of home care.
designThis was a single-centre, hospital ward-based retrospective observational study. SETTING AND
participantsFrom March 2011 to September 2018, 393 cancer-free older patients (median age, 84.0 years; 53.9% women) receiving continuous medical care at home through clinics were enrolled upon admission to a hospital ward. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Continuous cumulative survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method for two groups: inpatient respite care users and non-users. Additionally, prognostic factors associated with all-cause mortality were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
resultsThe Kaplan-Meier curves for inpatient respite care users without cancer admitted to the hospital ward demonstrated a longer median survival time than non-users. Subgroup analyses for patients with or without neurological disorders yielded similar results. The HR for inpatient respite care use, after adjusting for age, sex and other confounding variables, was 0.480 (95% CI: 0.328 to 0.703, p<0.001).
conclusionsHomebound patients without cancer receiving inpatient respite care during the study period in Japan demonstrated higher overall survival than those who did not receive respite care. Subgroup analysis of patients with neurological disorders yielded similar results. Further studies are needed to investigate the benefits of inpatient respite care, including the exploration of appropriate methods for its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.