ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2025
Response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive invasive breast cancers with different HER2 FISH patterns.
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive patients with breast cancer may have different HER2/CEP17 ratios and HER2 copy numbers, with inconsistent responses to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Our study aimed to explore the relationship between different HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) patterns in HER2-positive patients with breast cancer and responses to anti-HER2 NACT.
methods527 patients with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer who received anti-HER2 NACT from 2015 to 2022 were included and divided into three groups by FISH results, namely group A: HER2/CEP17<2.0 and HER2 copy numbers ≥6.0, HER2 immunohistochemistry 2/3+; group B: HER2/CEP17≥2.0 and HER2 copy numbers ≥4.0 and <6.0; group C: HER2/CEP17≥2.0 and HER2 copy numbers ≥6.0. We compared clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) rates of different groups.
resultsAccording to HER2 FISH results, 12 patients (2.3%, 12/527) were in group A, 40 (7.6%, 40/527) were in group B and 475 (90.1%, 475/527) were in group C. The pCR rate was the lowest in group B (5.0%), while the pCR rates in group A and group C were 33.3% and 44.4%, respectively (p
conclusionsPatients with HER2/CEP17≥2.0 and HER2 copy numbers ≥4.0 and <6.0 do not benefit to the same extent from current anti-HER2 therapies as FISH-positive patients with other patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.