Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346744›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024

Strong Diagnostic Performance of Single Energy 256-row Multidetector Computed Tomography with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in the Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis.

Shuhei Aoki, Hiroyuki Takaoka, Joji Ota, Tomonori Kanaeda, Takayuki Sakai, Koji Matsumoto, Yoshitada Noguchi, Yusei Nishikawa, Satomi Yashima, Katsuya Suzuki and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cardiac Computed Tomography: Technological Developments and Clinical Applications.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shuhei AokiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakaokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Joji OtaDepartment of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Tomonori KanaedaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Japan.
Takayuki SakaiDepartment of Radiology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Japan.
Koji MatsumotoDepartment of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Japan.
Yoshitada NoguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yusei NishikawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Satomi YashimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Katsuya SuzukiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Kazuki YoshidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Makiko KinoshitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Noriko Suzuki-EguchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Haruka SasakiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for evaluating abnormal myocardial fibrosis and extracellular volume (ECV) of the left ventricular myocardium (LVM), a similar evaluation has recently become possible using computed tomography (CT). In this study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a new 256-row multidetector CT with a low tube-voltage single energy scan and deep-learning-image reconstruction (DLIR) in detecting abnormal late enhancement (LE) in LVM. Methods We evaluated the diagnostic performance of CT for detecting LE in LVM and compared the results with those of MRI as a reference. We also measured the ECV of the LVM on CT and compared the results with those on MRI. Materials We analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac CT, including a late-phase scan and MRI, within three months of suspected cardiomyopathy. All patients underwent 256-slice CT (Revolution APEX; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, USA) with a low tube-voltage (70 kV) single energy scan and DLIR for a late-phase scan. Results In patient- and segment-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of detection of LE on CT were 94% and 85%, 100% and 95%, and 96% and 93%, respectively. The ECV of LVM per patient on CT and MRI was 33.0±6.2% and 35.9±6.1%, respectively. These findings were extremely strongly correlated, with a correlation coefficient of 0.87 (p<0.0001). The effective radiation dose on late-phase scanning was 2.4±0.9 mSv. Conclusion The diagnostic performance of 256-row multislice CT with a low tube voltage and DLIR for detecting LE and measuring ECV in LVM is credible.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesDeep LearningFibrosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumRetrospective Studiescomputed tomographydeep leaning image reconstructionlate enhancementleft ventricular myocardium

Identifiers

PMID38346744
PMCPMC11473283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.