Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346200›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Multimodal neuro-nanotechnology: Challenging the existing paradigm in glioblastoma therapy.

Sergej Kudruk, Connor M Forsyth, Michelle Z Dion, Jenny K Hedlund Orbeck, Jingqin Luo, Robyn S Klein, Albert H Kim, Amy B Heimberger, Chad A Mirkin, Alexander H Stegh and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Structural immunotherapy: Harnessing chemical design to build powerful next-generation therapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sergej Kudruk *Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-6402-0292
Connor M Forsyth *Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-861X
Michelle Z DionWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-561X
Jenny K Hedlund OrbeckDepartment of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-802X
Jingqin LuoThe Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Robyn S KleinDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0281-1352
Albert H KimThe Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.ORCID 0000-0002-1751-8493
Amy B HeimbergerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.
Chad A MirkinDepartment of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-7627
Alexander H SteghThe Brain Tumor Center, Alvin J. Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Natalie ArtziHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Northwestern University · USNeurological Surgery · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
STINGing GBM: A First-in- Man Clinical Trial in Surgical Resectable Recurrent GBMP50CA221747 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Hui Zhang · 2018 to 2026
$21.4M
Theranostic Magnetic Nanostructures for the Molecular Imaging of CancerU54CA151880 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI OMARY, REED A. · 2010 to 2014
$11.5M
Modulation of Microglia and T Cell Interactions in Malignant GliomaR01CA120813 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, GANESH · 2007 to 2025
$4.7M
A Phase II Clinical Trial in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Treated with WP1066 and RadiationR01CA272639 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Amy Beth Heimberger, Priya U. Kumthekar · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Spherical Nucleic Acid nano-architectures as first-in-class cGAS agonists for the immunotherapeutic treatment of Glioblastoma.R01CA275430 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MIRKIN, CHAD A., STEGH, ALEXANDER H. · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
Stinging the Glioma Immune LandscapeR01NS120547 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HEIMBERGER, AMY BETH, RAO, ARVIND · 2020 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221747NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120813NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272639NCI NIH HHS R01 CA275430NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151880NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS120547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating multimodal neuro- and nanotechnology-enabled precision immunotherapies with extant systemic immunotherapies may finally provide a significant breakthrough for combatting glioblastoma (GBM). The potency of this approach lies in its ability to train the immune system to efficiently identify and eradicate cancer cells, thereby creating anti-tumor immune memory while minimizing multi-mechanistic immune suppression. A critical aspect of these therapies is the controlled, spatiotemporal delivery of structurally defined nanotherapeutics into the GBM tumor microenvironment (TME). Architectures such as spherical nucleic acids or poly(beta-amino ester)/dendrimer-based nanoparticles have shown promising results in preclinical models due to their multivalency and abilities to activate antigen-presenting cells and prime antigen-specific T cells. These nanostructures also permit systematic variation to optimize their distribution, TME accumulation, cellular uptake, and overall immunostimulatory effects. Delving deeper into the relationships between nanotherapeutic structures and their performance will accelerate nano-drug development and pave the way for the rapid clinical translation of advanced nanomedicines. In addition, the efficacy of nanotechnology-based immunotherapies may be enhanced when integrated with emerging precision surgical techniques, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy, and when combined with systemic immunotherapies, particularly inhibitors of immune-mediated checkpoints and immunosuppressive adenosine signaling. In this perspective, we highlight the potential of emerging treatment modalities, combining advances in biomedical engineering and neurotechnology development with existing immunotherapies to overcome treatment resistance and transform the management of GBM. We conclude with a call to action for researchers to leverage these technologies and accelerate their translation into the clinic.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNanoparticlesNanostructuresHumansImmunotherapyNanotechnologyTumor Microenvironmentglioblastomaimmunotherapyneuro-nanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID38346200
PMCPMC10895370
OpenAlexW4391756661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.