Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346163›Full record

ArticleTissue barriers2024

Highly scalable and standardized organ-on-chip platform with TEER for biological barrier modeling.

Hoang-Tuan Nguyen, Siiri-Liisa Rissanen, Mimosa Peltokangas, Tino Laakkonen, Jere Kettunen, Lara Barthod, Ragul Sivakumar, Anniina Palojärvi, Pauliina Junttila, Jussi Talvitie and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue barriers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. HumanBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Mechano-Organ-on-Chip for Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Recreating chronic respiratory infectionsEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hoang-Tuan NguyenFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0073-5942
Siiri-Liisa RissanenFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Mimosa PeltokangasFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Tino LaakkonenFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Jere KettunenFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Lara BarthodFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Ragul SivakumarFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Anniina PalojärviFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Pauliina JunttilaFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Jussi TalvitieFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Michele BassisDevelopmental and Cellular Biology, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Sarah L NickelsDevelopmental and Cellular Biology, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Sara KalvalaA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Polina IlinaDrug Research Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi TammelaDrug Research Program, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sarka LehtonenA. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jens C SchwambornDevelopmental and Cellular Biology, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Sebastien MosserFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Prateek SinghFinnadvance Ltd, Oulu, Finland.
Covance (United States) · USUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new therapies is hampered by the lack of predictive, and patient-relevant in vitro models. Organ-on-chip (OOC) technologies can potentially recreate physiological features and hold great promise for tissue and disease modeling. However, the non-standardized design of these chips and perfusion control systems has been a barrier to quantitative high-throughput screening (HTS). Here we present a scalable OOC microfluidic platform for applied kinetic in vitro assays (AKITA) that is applicable for high, medium, and low throughput. Its standard 96-well plate and 384-well plate layouts ensure compatibility with existing laboratory workflows and high-throughput data collection and analysis tools. The AKITA plate is optimized for the modeling of vascularized biological barriers, primarily the blood-brain barrier, skin, and lung, with precise flow control on a custom rocker. The integration of trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) sensors allows rapid and repeated monitoring of barrier integrity over long time periods. Together with automated liquid handling and compound permeability testing analyses, we demonstrate the flexibility of the AKITA platform for establishing human-relevant models for preclinical drug and precision medicine's efficacy, toxicity, and permeability under near-physiological conditions.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesBlood-Brain BarrierElectric ImpedanceHumansModels, BiologicalBlood-brain barrierdrug discoveryhigh throughput screeninglungmicrofluidicsorgan-on-chipshear stressskinTEERvascular barriers

Identifiers

PMID38346163
PMCPMC11583584
OpenAlexW4391741532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.