Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346098›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2024

Resolving Multi-Asperity Contacts at the Nanoscale through Super-Resolution Fluorescence Imaging.

Begüm Demirkurt, Dina Petrova, Dharmendar Kumar Sharma, Martin Vacha, Bart Weber, Daniel Bonn, Albert M Brouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Roughness-dependent scaling of the contact area and separation gap with pressure for glassy polymers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Molecular Probing of the Microscopic Pressure at Contact Interfaces.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Begüm Demirkurtvan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1404-906X
Dina Petrovavan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-0760
Dharmendar Kumar SharmaTokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1-S8, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-3457
Martin VachaTokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1-S8, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5729-9774
Bart WeberAdvanced Research Center for Nanolithography (ARCNL), Science Park 106, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-4666
Daniel BonnInstitute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94485, 1090 GL Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-1997
Albert M Brouwervan't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1731-3869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact mechanics, spanning nanometer to tectonic scales, faces long-standing challenges arising from multiscale random roughness, which hinders experimental validation of theories. Understanding multi-asperity rough contacts is vital for addressing catastrophic consequences of these contacts failing such as earthquakes and for diverse technological applications. To visualize such contacts, we introduce a super-resolution microscopy method utilizing spontaneous millisecond ON/OFF fluorescence blinking of contact-sensitive molecular rotor molecules immobilized on a glass coverslip. This technique achieves ∼55 nm lateral imaging resolution for rough poly(methyl methacrylate) and glass spheres on glass contacts. For soft polymer spheres due to large plastic deformation, the resolution improvement does not significantly affect the area of real contact. However, for hard glass spheres, the real contact area is found to be 2.4 times smaller than that found by diffraction-limited imaging. This study highlights, through direct visualization, the impact of material stiffness on the nanoscale structure within the area of real contact.

Identifiers

PMID38346098
PMCPMC10895690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.