Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38346094›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

A CNN-based denoising method trained with images acquired with electron density phantoms for thin-sliced coronary artery calcium scans.

Ching-Ching Yang, Kuei-Yuan Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ching-Ching YangDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kuei-Yuan HouDepartment of Radiology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

Kaohsiung Medical University Research Foundation KMU-M113022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis work proposed a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method trained with images acquired with electron density phantoms to reduce quantum noise for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans reconstructed with slice thickness less than 3 mm.

methodsA DenseNet model was used to estimate quantum noise for CAC scans reconstructed with slice thickness of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mm. Training data was acquired using electron density phantoms in three different sizes. The label images of the CNN model were real noise maps, while the input images of the CNN model were pseudo noise maps. Image denoising was conducted by subtracting the CNN output images from thin-sliced CAC scans. The efficacy of the proposed method was verified through both phantom study and patient study.

resultsBy means of phantom study, the proposed method was proven effective in reducing quantum noise in CAC scans reconstructed with 1.5-mm slice thickness without causing significant texture change or variation in HU values. With regard to patient study, calcifications were more clear on the denoised CAC scans reconstructed with slice thickness of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 mm than on 3-mm slice images, while over-smooth changes were not observed in the denoised CAC scans reconstructed with 1.5-mm slice thickness.

conclusionOur results demonstrated that the electron density phantoms can be used to generate training data for the proposed CNN-based denoising method to reduce quantum noise for CAC scans reconstructed with 1.5-mm slice thickness. Because anthropomorphic phantom is not a necessity, our method could make image denoising more practical in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

CalciumTomography, X-Ray ComputedCoronary VesselsElectronsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, ImagingCalciumCNN-based denoising methodcoronary artery calcium scanpartial volume effect

Identifiers

PMID38346094
PMCPMC10930013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.