ArticlePLoS computational biology2024
Learning what matters: Synaptic plasticity with invariance to second-order input correlations.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergence of sparse coding, balance and decorrelation from a biologically-grounded spiking neural network model of learning in the primary visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical populations of neurons develop sparse representations adapted to the statistics of the environment. To learn efficient population codes, synaptic plasticity mechanisms must differentiate relevant latent features from spurious input correlations, which are omnipresent in cortical networks. Here, we develop a theory for sparse coding and synaptic plasticity that is invariant to second-order correlations in the input. Going beyond classical Hebbian learning, our learning objective explains the functional form of observed excitatory plasticity mechanisms, showing how Hebbian long-term depression (LTD) cancels the sensitivity to second-order correlations so that receptive fields become aligned with features hidden in higher-order statistics. Invariance to second-order correlations enhances the versatility of biologically realistic learning models, supporting optimal decoding from noisy inputs and sparse population coding from spatially correlated stimuli. In a spiking model with triplet spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), we show that individual neurons can learn localized oriented receptive fields, circumventing the need for input preprocessing, such as whitening, or population-level lateral inhibition. The theory advances our understanding of local unsupervised learning in cortical circuits, offers new interpretations of the Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro and triplet STDP models, and assigns a specific functional role to synaptic LTD mechanisms in pyramidal neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.