Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345755›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Validation of the Prognostic Performance of Breast Cancer Index in Hormone Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients in the TEAM Trial.

John M S Bartlett, Keying Xu, Jenna Wong, Gregory Pond, Yi Zhang, Melanie Spears, Ranelle Salunga, Elizabeth Mallon, Karen J Taylor, Annette Hasenburg and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

John M S BartlettCancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-3888
Keying XuDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1981-4541
Jenna WongBiotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California.ORCID 0009-0008-3211-5343
Gregory PondDepartment of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.ORCID 0000-0003-1033-0882
Yi ZhangBiotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California.ORCID 0009-0006-4642-2147
Melanie SpearsDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-4675
Ranelle SalungaBiotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California.ORCID 0009-0005-7323-5796
Elizabeth MallonDepartment of Pathology, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-3423-4220
Karen J TaylorCancer Research UK Scotland Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2265-5097
Annette HasenburgDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-4968
Christos MarkopoulosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5072-6390
Luc DirixSt. Augustinus Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-1677
Cornelis J H van de VeldeLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0104-1800
Daniel ReaCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7301-4030
Catherine A SchnabelBiotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California.ORCID 0009-0006-5500-9290
Kai TreunerBiotheranostics, A Hologic Company, San Diego, California.ORCID 0009-0006-3443-3578
Jane BayaniDiagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-5888
Biothera (United States) · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEHologic (United States) · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLMcMaster University · CANational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity of Applied Sciences Mainz · DEWestern Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer face a prolonged risk of recurrence even after adjuvant endocrine therapy. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is significantly prognostic for overall (0-10 years) and late (5-10 years) distant recurrence (DR) risk in N0 and N1 patients. Here, BCI prognostic performance was evaluated in HR+ postmenopausal women from the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial. EXPERIMENTAL

design3,544 patients were included in the analysis (N = 1,519 N0, N = 2,025 N+). BCI risk groups were calculated using pre-specified cutoff points. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to assess the prognostic significance of BCI risk groups based on DR. Hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox models with and without clinical covariates.

resultsFor overall 10-year DR, BCI was significantly prognostic in Ni0 (N = 1,196) and N1 (N = 1,234) patients who did not receive prior chemotherapy (P < 0.001). In patients who were DR-free for 5 years, 10-year late DR rates for low- and high-risk groups were 5.4% and 9.3% (N0 cohort, N = 1,285) and 4.8% and 12.2% (N1 cohort, N = 1,625) with multivariate HRs of 2.25 (95% CI, 1.30-3.88; P = 0.004) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.53-4.63; P < 0.001), respectively. Late DR performance was substantially improved using previously optimized cutoff points, identifying BCI low-risk groups with even lower 10-year late DR rates of 3.8% and 2.7% in N0 and N1 patients, respectively.

conclusionsThe TEAM trial represents the largest prognostic validation study for BCI to date and provides a more representative assessment of late DR risk to guide individualized treatment decision-making for HR+ patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostmenopausePrognosisRisk FactorsTamoxifenTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID38345755
PMCPMC11016895
OpenAlexW4391755468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.