ReviewDiabetologia2024
Harnessing the power of proteomics in precision diabetes medicine.
Review in Diabetologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Large-scale multi-omics enhance risk prediction for type 2 diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Five tenets for advancing evidence-based precision medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Proteomics research in aging: a bibliometric and visualized analysis of evolution and emerging trends (1998-2024 and early 2025).Biogerontology · 2025Article
- The metformin mediated MAPK signaling pathway influences D-Xylose regulation during diabetic kidney disease therapy.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Frequent longitudinal blood microsampling and proteome monitoring identify disease markers and enable timely intervention in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2025Article
- Data-driven cluster analysis on the association of aging, obesity and insulin resistance with new-onset diabetes in Chinese adults: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Microbial and proteomic signatures of type 2 diabetes in an Arab population.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- The Circulating Proteome─Technological Developments, Current Challenges, and Future Trends.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Longitudinal clinical and proteomic diabetes signatures in women with a history of gestational diabetes.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Clinical and Microbiological Periodontal Biofilm Evaluation of Patients with Type I Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Causal drivers of human proteome variation in health and disease.Nature metabolism · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision diabetes medicine (PDM) aims to reduce errors in prevention programmes, diagnosis thresholds, prognosis prediction and treatment strategies. However, its advancement and implementation are difficult due to the heterogeneity of complex molecular processes and environmental exposures that influence an individual's disease trajectory. To address this challenge, it is imperative to develop robust screening methods for all areas of PDM. Innovative proteomic technologies, alongside genomics, have proven effective in precision cancer medicine and are showing promise in diabetes research for potential translation. This narrative review highlights how proteomics is well-positioned to help improve PDM. Specifically, a critical assessment of widely adopted affinity-based proteomic technologies in large-scale clinical studies and evidence of the benefits and feasibility of using MS-based plasma proteomics is presented. We also present a case for the use of proteomics to identify predictive protein panels for type 2 diabetes subtyping and the development of clinical prediction models for prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment strategies. Lastly, we discuss the importance of plasma and tissue proteomics and its integration with genomics (proteogenomics) for identifying unique type 2 diabetes intra- and inter-subtype aetiology. We conclude with a call for action formed on advancing proteomics technologies, benchmarking their performance and standardisation across sites, with an emphasis on data sharing and the inclusion of diverse ancestries in large cohort studies. These efforts should foster collaboration with key stakeholders and align with ongoing academic programmes such as the Precision Medicine in Diabetes Initiative consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38345659What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.