ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Septic cardiomyopathy-diagnosis and estimation of disease severity].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpretable gradient boosting machine model for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis-induced myocardial injury: a multicenter development, validation, and web-based clinical implementation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- PTGDS: As a Specific Biomarker for Septic Cardiomyopathy.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe relevance of septic cardiomyopathy is frequently underestimated due to the complexity of the pattern of cardiac injury and the corresponding difficulties in quantifying the degree of functional impairment.
aimAccount of the methods for diagnosis and severity classification of septic cardiomyopathy.
methodsLiterature review and analysis of the main findings.
resultsSeptic cardiomyopathy is characterized by both systolic and diastolic impairment of not only the left, but also the right ventricle, as well as by sinus-tachycardiomyopathy (≥ 90-95 beats/min) of variable degree. Sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), ECG and cardiac biomarkers do not help in grading severity of septic cardiomyopathy. For that purpose either a sophisticated echocardiography diagnosis is mandatory, or the measurement of those global heart function parameters which take into account the dependency of cardiac output on afterload, in view of the pronounced vasodilatation in sepsis and septic shock, is needed. A suitable parameter on the basis of cardiac output measurement is afterload-related cardiac performance (ACP), which gives the percentage of cardiac output in a septic patient related to the cardiac output a healthy heart pumps when challenged by a fall in systemic vascular resistance to the same extent. The calculation of ACP shows that at least one in two septic patients suffers from impaired heart function and that mortality increases as severity increases.
conclusionSimple parameters like LVEF are not apt for diagnosis nor for disease severity classification of septic cardiomyopathy. For that purpose either sophisticated echocardiography techniques or load-independent parameters-best validated-ACP measurements are appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.