Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345641›Full record

SynthesisHuman reproduction update2024

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies following assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 802 462 pregnancies.

Shemoon Marleen, Wasana Kodithuwakku, Ruvini Nandasena, Shezoon Mohideen, John Allotey, Silvia Fernández-García, Andrea Gaetano-Gil, Gabriel Ruiz-Calvo, Joseph Aquilina, Asma Khalil and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human reproduction update, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Association betweenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Shemoon MarleenBarts Research Centre for Women's Health (BARC), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-5156
Wasana KodithuwakkuInstitute of Neurology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo 10, Sri Lanka.
Ruvini NandasenaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Jayewardenepura Postgraduate Teaching Hospital, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Shezoon MohideenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Jayewardenepura Postgraduate Teaching Hospital, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
John AlloteyWorld Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Silvia Fernández-GarcíaWorld Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Andrea Gaetano-GilClinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Gabriel Ruiz-CalvoClinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Joseph AquilinaRoyal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Asma KhalilSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Priya BhideBarts Research Centre for Women's Health (BARC), Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Javier ZamoraWorld Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Shakila ThangaratinamWorld Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Birmingham Women's Hospital · GBInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ESQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Sri Jayewardenepura · LKBarts Health NHS Trust · GBNational Hospital of Sri Lanka · LKSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundART is associated with higher rates of twin pregnancies than singleton pregnancies. Whether twin pregnancies conceived following ART have additional maternal and neonatal complications compared with non-ART twin pregnancies is not known. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective was to quantify the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among twin pregnancies conceived following ART compared with non-ART and natural conception. Existing reviews vary in the reported outcomes, with many studies including triplet pregnancies in the study population. Therefore, we aimed to perform an up-to-date review with an in-depth analysis of maternal and perinatal outcomes limited to twin pregnancies. SEARCH

methodsWe searched electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1990 to May 2023 without language restrictions. All cohort studies reporting maternal and perinatal outcomes following ART compared with non-ART twin pregnancies and natural conception were included. Case-control studies, case reports, case series, animal studies, and in vitro studies were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Using random-effects meta-analysis, the estimates were pooled and the findings were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. OUTCOMES: We included 111 studies (802 462 pregnancies). Twin pregnancies conceived following ART were at higher risk of preterm birth at <34 weeks (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.56, 29 studies, I2 = 73%), <37 weeks (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.19-1.33, 70 studies, I2 = 76%), hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46, 59 studies, I2 = 87%), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.48-1.75, 51 studies, I2 = 65%), and caesarean delivery (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.65-1.97, 70 studies, I2 = 89%) compared with non-ART twins. The risks for the above maternal outcomes were also increased in the ART group compared with natural conception. Of the perinatal outcomes, ART twins were at significantly increased risk of congenital malformations (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05-1.30, 39 studies, I2 = 59%), birthweight discordance (>25% (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.63, 7 studies, I2 = 0%)), respiratory distress syndrome (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.60, 16 studies, I2 = 61%), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35, 32 studies, I2 = 87%) compared with non-ART twins. When comparing ART with natural conception, the risk of respiratory distress syndrome, intensive care admissions, and birthweight discordance >25% was higher among the ART group. Perinatal complications, such as stillbirth (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, 33 studies, I2 = 49%), small for gestational age <10th centile (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95, 26 studies, I2 = 36%), and twin-twin transfusion syndrome (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.82, 9 studies, I2 = 25%), were reduced in twin pregnancies conceived with ART versus those without ART. The above perinatal complications were also fewer amongst the ART group than natural conception. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: ART twin pregnancies are associated with higher maternal complications than non-ART pregnancies and natural conception, with varied perinatal outcomes. Women seeking ART should be counselled about the increased risks of ART twin pregnancies and should be closely monitored in pregnancy for complications. We recommend exercising caution when interpreting the study findings owing to the study's limitations.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomePregnancy, TwinReproductive Techniques, AssistedFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPremature BirthARTmaternal outcomesmultiple pregnancyneonatal outcomesnon-ARToffspring outcomestwins

Identifiers

PMID38345641
PMCPMC11063550
OpenAlexW4391744381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.