Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345550›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Aprepitant Restores Corneal Sensitivity and Reduces Pain in DED.

Filippo Bonelli, Fabiola Campestre, Romina Mayra Lasagni Vitar, Ibrahim Halil Demirsoy, Philippe Fonteyne, Giulio Ferrari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Filippo BonelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Fabiola CampestreDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Romina Mayra Lasagni VitarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ibrahim Halil DemirsoyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Philippe FonteyneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giulio FerrariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Repair Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the efficacy of two aprepitant formulations (X1 and X2), in a preclinical model of dry eye disease (DED) induced by benzalkonium chloride (BAK). Methods: Two aprepitant formulations were tested on 7 to 8-week-old male mice for their efficacy. In vivo corneal fluorescein staining assessed epithelial damage as the primary end point on days 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 14 using slit-lamp microscopy. The DED model was induced with 0.2% BAK twice daily for the first week and once daily for the next week. Mice were randomly assigned to 5 treatment groups: Aprepitant X1 (n = 10) and X2 (n = 10) formulation, 2 mg/mL dexamethasone (n = 10), control vehicle X (n = 10), 0.2% hyaluronic acid (n = 10), or no treatment (n = 10). Eye wiping, phenol red, and Cochet Bonnet tests assessed ocular pain, tear fluid secretion, and nerve function. After 7 days, the mice were euthanized to quantify leukocyte infiltration and corneal nerve density. Results: Topical aprepitant X1 reduced BAK-induced corneal damage and pain compared to gel vehicle X (P = 0.007) and dexamethasone (P = 0.021). Aprepitant X1 and X2 improved corneal sensitivity versus gel vehicle X and dexamethasone (P < 0.001). Aprepitant X1 reduced leukocyte infiltration (P < 0.05) and enhanced corneal nerve density (P < 0.001). Tear fluid secretion remained statistically unchanged in both the X1 and X2 groups. Conclusions: Aprepitant formulation X1 reduced pain, improved corneal sensitivity and nerve density, ameliorated epitheliopathy, and reduced leukocyte infiltration in male mouse corneas. Translational Relevance: Aprepitant emerges as a safe, promising therapeutic prospect for the amelioration of DED's associated symptoms.

Indexed as

CorneaPainAnimalsAprepitantDexamethasoneFluoresceinMaleMiceAprepitantDexamethasoneFluorescein

Identifiers

PMID38345550
PMCPMC10866158
OpenAlexW4391755057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.