ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2024
Development and validation of the Iranian version of the Children's Experiences of Dental Anxiety Measure (CEDAM).
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Dental Fear and Anxiety Tools for Children: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of the Iranian version of the Children's Experiences of Dental Anxiety Measure (CEDAM).Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop the Iranian version of the Children's Experiences of Dental Anxiety Measure (CEDAM) and evaluate its validity and reliability in assessing dental anxiety in children aged 9-16.
methodsThe CEDAM was translated into Persian following the guidelines of the IQOLA project. A sample of children completed the measure in a clinical setting, with a subgroup completing it again to assess test-retest reliability. Concurrent criterion validity was evaluated by having all participants complete the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDAS) alongside the CEDAM. Construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
resultsThe study included 275 children between the ages of 9 and 16. The Iranian version of CEDAM exhibited excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's ⍺ coefficient of 0.83. Test-retest reliability was also high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient value of 0.96. Furthermore, there was a significant and positive correlation between CEDAM and MCDAS scores (ρ = 0.72, p < .01). Exploratory factor analysis identified two factors, and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the instrument aligned well with the factor structure obtained from the exploratory analysis.
conclusionThis study provides evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Iranian version of CEDAM as a valuable tool for evaluating dental anxiety in Persian-speaking children between the ages of 9 and 16..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.