Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345430›Full record

ArticleBiology open2024

Automated counting of Drosophila imaginal disc cell nuclei.

Pablo Sanchez Bosch, Jeffrey D Axelrod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pablo Sanchez BoschDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0574-4530
Jeffrey D AxelrodDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-7392

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Planar cell polarity mechanisms and systems architectureR35GM131914 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey D. Axelrod · 2019 to 2026
$7.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131914NIH HHS P40 OD018537NIH HHS R35 GM131914Swiss National Science Foundation P400PB_199258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated image quantification workflows have dramatically improved over the past decade, enriching image analysis and enhancing the ability to achieve statistical power. These analyses have proved especially useful for studies in organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster, where it is relatively simple to obtain high sample numbers for downstream analyses. However, the developing wing, an intensively utilized structure in developmental biology, has eluded efficient cell counting workflows due to its highly dense cellular population. Here, we present efficient automated cell counting workflows capable of quantifying cells in the developing wing. Our workflows can count the total number of cells or count cells in clones labeled with a fluorescent nuclear marker in imaginal discs. Moreover, by training a machine-learning algorithm we have developed a workflow capable of segmenting and counting twin-spot labeled nuclei, a challenging problem requiring distinguishing heterozygous and homozygous cells in a background of regionally varying intensity. Our workflows could potentially be applied to any tissue with high cellular density, as they are structure-agnostic, and only require a nuclear label to segment and count cells.

Indexed as

DrosophilaImaginal DiscsAnimalsCell NucleusDrosophila melanogasterLarvaClonal analysisDrosophilaImage quantificationImaginal discs

Identifiers

PMID38345430
PMCPMC10903266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.