Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38345425›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Accessory cavitated uterine malformation (ACUM): A scoping review.

Stefan Timmerman, Lauren Stubbe, Thierry Van den Bosch, Dominique Van Schoubroeck, Tina Tellum, Wouter Froyman

Open access · diamondAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: A case report of eight patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation (ACUM): A scoping review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan TimmermanDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2253-7522
Lauren StubbeDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thierry Van den BoschDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-5036
Dominique Van SchoubroeckDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tina TellumDepartment of Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2635-4504
Wouter FroymanDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-9124
KU Leuven · BEOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccessory cavitated uterine malformation (ACUM) is a relatively recent term used to describe a noncommunicating, accessory uterine cavity. ACUM have been published under different terms ranging from juvenile cystic adenomyosis to "uterus-like mass". The objective of this study was to systematically identify all cases of ACUM and definitions described in the literature, regardless of label, and identify morphological, epidemiological, and clinical characteristics as well as management, while also highlighting knowledge gaps. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic literature search of three databases was performed, reviewing all records of cystic myometrial lesions. Cases that fitted common definitions for ACUM were included and clinical and imaging characteristics were documented in detail. This work was registered to PROSPERO and reporting followed PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews.

resultsA total of 53 articles were included, comprising 115 cases that met the minimal criteria for ACUM. The median age at onset of symptoms was 17 years, presenting with dysmenorrhea soon after menarche. A total of 19 women were parous. On ultrasound, ACUM appears as unilocular myometrial cysts, usually with ground-glass content. Hemorrhagic content is also observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with high signal intensity on both T2 and T1-weighted images. Ninety-five (83%) cases were managed surgically, with a trend towards primary nonsurgical options. Although no adverse outcomes were reported, long-term follow-up on subsequent fertility and pregnancy was rare.

conclusionsDespite its increasing recognition as a clinical entity, ACUM often remains underdiagnosed as it shares similarities with other myometrial masses. We propose a unified terminology and definition for ACUM based on the data in this review. ACUM presents as a cavitated lesion, surrounded by a myometrial mantle, in continuity with the anterolateral uterine wall and located beneath the insertion of the round ligament and the interstitial portion of the fallopian tube. In contrast to other uterine abnormalities, a normal uterine cavity is visualized. Future studies are needed, using a clear definition for ACUM, and prospectively investigating management strategies, including long-term follow-up of patient-reported symptoms, fertility, and pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

UterusFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUrogenital Abnormalitiesaccessory cavitated uterine malformationadenomyosisjuvenile cystic adenomyosisMullerian anomaliesmullerianosisultrasounduterus

Identifiers

PMID38345425
PMCPMC11103141
OpenAlexW4391755259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.