Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344866›Full record

Trial reportCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2024

Application of multistate modeling to clinical data analysis.

Joachim Grevel, Joshua Veasy, Blesson Chacko

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of multistate modeling to clinical data analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Response to "Enhance Multistate Models With Clinically Meaningful Graphs".CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Enhance Multistate Models With Clinically Meaningful Graphs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joachim GrevelJoachim Grevel Consulting, Liebenau, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4635-7211
Joshua VeasyBAST Inc Ltd., Leicester, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-4216-3446
Blesson ChackoBAST Inc Ltd., Leicester, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-7177-2852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multistate models have been used for decades to analyze the economics of expensive and long-lasting treatments. More recently they also served to address questions in clinical drug development. It seems timely to introduce the broader pharmacometrics community to the technical aspects and the problem-solving capabilities of these models. A minimal model is introduced that can answer questions of interest to drug developers, regulatory agencies, and patients (with their carers and payers). A clinical study is simulated where 1000 patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to placebo and active treatment. After a recruitment phase, deaths are counted, and an administrative data cutoff occurs 858 days after the first patient is randomized. The minimal model has one initial state, two transient states, and two absorbing states. Fully parameterized semi-Markov processes govern the unidirectional transitions between states. Simulations explore the influence of parameter uncertainty and sample size on the validity of statistical inferences. The questions of interest to stakeholders are addressed predominantly with graphic displays. All programming codes are made available. Both drug developers and regulators are invited to re-evaluate the methods currently in use to assess the benefits and risks of new treatments.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38344866
PMCPMC11015071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.