Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344725›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

The Prevalence of CKD in Australian Primary Care: Analysis of a National General Practice Dataset.

Min Jun, James Wick, Brendon L Neuen, Sradha Kotwal, Sunil V Badve, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers, David Peiris, Anthony Rodgers, Kellie Nallaiah and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Min JunThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
James WickDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brendon L NeuenThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sradha KotwalThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sunil V BadveThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
John ChalmersThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anthony RodgersThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kellie NallaiahThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Meg J JardineNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Vlado PerkovicFaculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Martin GallagherThe George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Paul E RonksleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australia varies substantially across reports. Using a large, nationally representative general practice data source, we determined the contemporary prevalence and staging of CKD in the Australian primary care. Methods: We performed a retrospective, community-based observational study of 2,720,529 adults with ≥1 visit to a general practice participating in the MedicineInsight program and ≥1 serum creatinine measurement (with or without a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] measurement) between 2011 and 2020. CKD prevalence was estimated using 3 definitions based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and UACR measurements with varying degrees of rigidity in terms of the number of measurements assessed to define CKD ("least", "moderate" and "most" rigid). Results: CKD prevalence in the cohort progressively increased over the 10-year study period, irrespective of the method used to define CKD. In 2020, CKD prevalence in the cohort was 8.4%, 4.7%, and 3.1% using the least, moderate, and most rigid definition, respectively. The number of patients with UACR measurements was low such that, among those with CKD in 2020, only 3.8%, 3.2%, and 1.5%, respectively, had both eGFR and UACR measurements available in the corresponding year. Patients in whom both eGFR and UACR measurements were available mostly had moderate or high risk of CKD progression (83.6%, 80.6%, and 76.2%, respectively). Conclusion: In this large, nationally representative study, we observed an increasing trend in CKD prevalence in primary care settings in Australia. Most patients with CKD were at moderate to high risk of CKD progression. These findings highlight the need for early detection and effective management to slow progression of CKD.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseeGFRepidemiologyprevalenceprimary careUACR

Identifiers

PMID38344725
PMCPMC10851013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.