Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344644›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Advancements in Varicose Vein Treatment: Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Minimally Invasive Techniques, Sclerotherapy, Patient Satisfaction, and Future Directions.

Faris Fayyaz, Viralkumar Vaghani, Chukwuyem Ekhator, Muhammad Abdullah, Rashed A Alsubari, Omar A Daher, Danyal Bakht, Hanen Batat, Hareem Arif, Sophia B Bellegarde and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Faris FayyazSurgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK.
Viralkumar VaghaniMcWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Chukwuyem EkhatorNeuro-Oncology, New York Institute of Technology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, USA.
Muhammad AbdullahGeneral Surgery and Medicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK.
Rashed A AlsubariMedicine and Surgery, October 6 University, Raleigh, USA.
Omar A DaherObstetrics and Gynaecology, Beirut Arab University, Tripoli, LBN.
Danyal BakhtMedicine and Surgery, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Hanen BatatMedicine, Yarmouk University, Irbid, JOR.
Hareem ArifInternal Medicine, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, Sukkur, PAK.
Sophia B BellegardePathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Antigua, Coolidge, ATG.
Pakeezah BisharatInternal Medicine, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, PAK.
Muhayya FaizullahMedicine and Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.
American University of Antigua · AGBeirut Arab University · LBDow University of Health Sciences · PKJinnah Medical & Dental College · PKKhyber Medical University · PKKing Edward Medical University · PKMayo Hospital · PKNew York Institute of Technology · USOctober 6 University · EGThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USYarmouk University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Varicose veins are a common vascular condition known for causing discomfort and cosmetic concerns. This comprehensive narrative review delves into their anatomy, pathophysiology, and modern treatment options, with a focus on endovenous techniques and sclerotherapy. The review starts by emphasizing the intricate anatomy of lower extremity venous circulation, underlining the significance of both superficial and deep venous networks in venous return. It also addresses how changes in the venous wall, including valvular insufficiency, contribute to the development of varicose veins. Endovenous techniques like endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and mechanochemical endovenous ablation (MOCA) are explored in detail. These minimally invasive procedures have revolutionized varicose vein treatment, offering high success rates and quicker recovery compared to traditional surgery. The review also highlights their efficacy and safety profiles, aiding clinicians in informed decision-making. Sclerotherapy, a vital modality for varicose veins, is thoroughly examined, covering both liquid and foam sclerotherapy. Foam sclerotherapy, in particular, is recognized for its improved outcomes. The review provides a comprehensive comparison of these treatment modalities, highlighting differences in technical success, recurrence rates, and cost-effectiveness. Patient preferences and satisfaction play a significant role in choosing the right treatment. Safety and potential complications associated with these treatments are explored, with a focus on minor issues and rare adverse events. This review also emphasizes the positive impact of varicose vein interventions on patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

cryotherapyendovenous managementradioablationsclerotherapyvaricose seins

Identifiers

PMID38344644
PMCPMC10853729
OpenAlexW4390697246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.