ArticleCureus2024
Prediction of Liver Enzyme Elevation Using Supervised Machine Learning in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Treatment with Methotrexate.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology Practice: From Implementation Concerns to Imaging and Clinical Application.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting adverse drug event using machine learning based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Unveiling Artificial Intelligence's Power: Precision, Personalization, and Progress in Rheumatology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study is to develop a machine learning (ML) model to accurately predict liver enzyme elevation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on treatment with methotrexate (MTX) using electronic health record (EHR) data from a real-world RA cohort. Methods Demographic, clinical, biochemical, and prescription information from 569 RA patients initiated on MTX were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was the liver transaminase elevation above the upper limit of normal (40 IU/mL), following the initiation of MTX. The total dataset was randomly split into a training (80%) and test set (20%) and used to develop a random forest classifier model. The best model was selected after hyper-parameter tuning and fivefold cross-validation. Results A total of 104 (18.2%) patients developed elevated transaminase while on MTX therapy. The best-performing predictive model had an accuracy/F1 score of 0.87. The top 10 predictive features were then used to create a limited feature model that retained most of the predictive accuracy, with an accuracy/F1 score of 0.86. Baseline high-normal transaminase levels, and higher lymphocyte and neutrophil blood count proportions were the highest predictors of elevated transaminase levels after MTX therapy. Conclusion Our proof-of-concept study suggests the possibility of building a well-performing ML model to predict liver transaminase elevation in RA patients being treated with MTX. Similar ML models could be used to identify "high-risk" patients and target them for early stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.