ArticleCureus2024
Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Lower Extremity Muscle Strength, Quality of Life, and Functional Recovery in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of device-based neuromodulation on the motor recovery of patients with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive cerebral and spinal cord stimulation for motor and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injury: Neurophysiological Basis and Severity-Based Clinical Framework.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Muscle strength and function are essential facets of rehabilitation for incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) patients. Various methods are being used to improve these outcome measures, but no gold standard method exists. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a relatively inexpensive, portable, readily available, and easy-to-use modality. It has shown promising results in many psychiatric and neurological conditions like stroke, cerebral palsy, and depression, but its role in spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively unexplored. The study's objectives are to investigate the effect of anodal tDCS on lower limb muscle strength, quality of Life (QoL), and function in individuals with iSCI. Methods A randomized single-blinded sham control parallel-group study was conducted at the Indian Spinal Injuries Centre in New Delhi, India. There were 32 iSCI participants (28 males and four females) with 23 traumatic and nine non-traumatic etiologies. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 40 minutes of 2 mA anodal or sham stimulation over the targeted motor cortex areas for five sessions per week over two weeks. The following outcome measures were measured at baseline after one and two weeks of the intervention: Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III), and WHO Quality of Life Bref (WHO QoL Bref). Results There was no significant difference at one week and two weeks of intervention for LEMS (p = 0.675, p = 0.978), SCIM III (p = 0.170, p = 0.133), WHO QoL Bref Domain 1 (p = 0.376, p = 0.282), Domain 2 (p = 0.728, p = 0.450), Domain 3 (p = 0.641, p = 0.993), Domain 4 (p = 0.294, p = 0.422), overall perception of QoL (p = 0.492, p = 1.000), and overall perception of their health (p = 0.300, p = 0.854) in the anodal and sham tDCS groups. Conclusion These primary findings suggest that anodal tDCS is ineffective in improving the QoL and motor and functional capabilities of individuals with iSCI. Further studies are necessary to determine whether it can be effective as a long-term rehabilitation strategy for the abovementioned population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.