Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344584›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Insulin Pump Therapy vs Multiple Daily Insulin Injections for Glycemic Control in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ernesto Calderon Martinez, Jaqueline L Castillo, Stephin Zachariah Saji, Daniel Stein, Tayyaba J Khan, Rosa F Guardado Williams, Irma D Munguía, Victor Sebastian Arruarana, Karen Velasquez

RetractedOpen access · diamondAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Ernesto Calderon MartinezDigital Health, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico, MEX.
Jaqueline L CastilloGeneral Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, MEX.
Stephin Zachariah SajiGraduate Medical Education, Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela, PHL.
Daniel SteinGeneral Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, GRD.
Tayyaba J KhanMedicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK.
Rosa F Guardado WilliamsGeneral Medicine, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, HND.
Irma D MunguíaGeneral Medicine, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, HND.
Victor Sebastian ArruaranaInternal Medicine, Brookdale University Hospital Medical Center, New York, USA.
Karen VelasquezGeneral Medicine, University of El Salvador, San Salvador, SLV.
Our Lady of Fatima University · PHUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of El Salvador · SVBrookdale University Hospital and Medical Center · USLiaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences · PKSt. George's University · GD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), characterized by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells and consequent insulin deficiency, leads to various complications. Management primarily focuses on optimal glycemic control through intensive insulin therapy, either via multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using insulin pumps, which offer flexibility and improved basal insulin delivery. Despite the benefits of insulin pumps, such as reduced hypoglycemia risk and better mealtime insulin management, they pose challenges such as complexity in site changes and potential ketoacidosis due to tubing issues. This systematic review adheres to PRISMA guidelines and compares CSII with MDI in children and adolescents with T1DM, concentrating on outcomes such as glycemic control measured with HbA1c and glucose levels. The review includes studies meeting stringent criteria, encompassing a broad range of methodologies and geographies. The findings of this meta-analysis indicate the differences in glycemic control with CSII compared to MDI. However, significant heterogeneity in results and methodological variations across studies necessitate cautious interpretation. The study underscores the potential of CSII in offering better control for some patients, supporting a more personalized approach to T1DM management. It highlights the need for further research to understand the long-term effects and to refine treatment protocols, considering the variations in healthcare systems, treatment approaches, and patient demographics globally.

Indexed as

bolus regimen of injecting insulinchildrencontinuous subcutaneous insulin therapydiabetes mellitus type 1glycemic controlhba1cinsulin pumpmdimultiple insulin injections

Identifiers

PMID38344584
PMCPMC10855014
OpenAlexW4390722000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.