ArticleCureus2024
Fluctuation in SARS-CoV-2 Environmental Surface Contamination Levels in Homes Where Patients With COVID-19 Stayed for Recuperation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) often occurs among family members. Elucidating where viable SARS-CoV-2 virions, and not just residual viral RNA, are present in the house is necessary to prevent the further spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to evaluate the environmental surface contamination levels of both SARS-CoV-2 RNA and viable viruses in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19. Methods Environmental samples were collected from the households of three patients in April and July 2022 when the number of new COVID-19 cases in Japan was reported to be approximately 50,000 and 200,000 cases per day, respectively. For each case, samples were obtained from 19-26 household sites for seven consecutive days. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was examined in 455 samples through reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and RT-qPCR-positive samples were subjected to plaque assay to detect viable viruses. Results Among the 455 samples, 63 (13.8%) that were collected from patients' pillows and comforters, doorknobs, chairs, and refrigerators tested positive by RT-qPCR. The maximum detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive samples in each case ranged from 20.0% to 57.7% on days 1 to 3. The detection rate gradually decreased to 0-5.3% as the days elapsed. Although all RT-qPCR-positive samples were examined, no viable viruses were detected in these samples. Conclusions Although environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was observed in the homes of housebound patients with COVID-19, no viable viruses were isolated. This suggests that the indirect transmission risk from fomites was low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.