Open Reduction and Plate Fixation, External Fixator, and Conservative Treatment for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures.

Background Distal radius fractures are common fractures. Treatment of intra-articular fractures is controversial, with treatment modalities including closed reduction and casting, open reduction and plating, and closed reduction and fixation with an external fixator. In this study, we compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of our patients treated with three different methods for intra-articular distal radius fractures. We hypothesize that open reduction and plate application are superior. Methodology Adult patients with intra-articular (AO type B and C) fractures of the distal radius and treated with closed reduction-casting, volar locking plate, and external fixator were identified. Radiologically, joint stepping at the end of treatment, radial inclination, radial height, volar tilt, and distal ulna fracture were examined. For clinical scoring, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) scores were computed. Obtained data were compared statistically between groups. Results A total of 164 patients were included in the study. Overall, the treatment modality was conservative in 61, volar with plating in 78, and external fixation in 25. The mean age of the patients was 53.7 years (range = 20-82 years). Overall, 39.6% of the patients were male and 60.4% were female. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 16.7 months (range = 12-28 months). No statistically significant difference was found between Q-DASH scores in the statistical evaluation (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the radiological evaluation. When conservative treatment and the volar plate group were compared, the volar plate was superior in all radiological parameters (p < 0.05). Compared with conservative treatment and external fixation, only volar tilt and radial inclination angle were different. External fixation was better (p < 0.05). Radial length, volar compared to plate and external fixation tilt, and ulnar variance were better in the plate group (p < 0.05). Regarding joint stepping and radial, there was no difference in inclination between the two groups (p > 0.05). Reflex sympathetic dystrophy was seen in a total of 10 (6.1%) patients. Pin-site infection was seen in three (12%) patients in the external fixator group. Implant removal was performed in seven (9.0%) patients who developed plaque due to irritation and tenosynovitis. Early arthrosis was seen in three (4.3%) patients. Conclusions The treatment of distal radius intra-articular fractures should be evaluated and decided individually for each patient. No single method is directly superior to other methods. However, in some cases, the best results radiologically in the treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures have been obtained in patients with volar plates.