ReviewCureus2024
Pain Management During Adult Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transversus abdominis plane block versus port site anesthetic in adult laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of TAP and M-TAPA Blocks in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: Recommendations for Perioperative Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The opioid epidemic has become a critical public health issue, driven by the widespread distribution and misuse of prescription opioids. This paper investigates analgesic management in the context of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) as an alternative to open appendectomy, aiming to reduce the reliance on opioids for postoperative pain control. A comprehensive literature review was conducted from January 1, 2003, to November 1, 2023, utilizing PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect databases. The search focused on peer-reviewed experimental and observational studies involving adults (18 years and older) undergoing LA. The original search resulted in 18,258 publications, which were then screened using PRISMA guidelines. Among the filtered 18 studies included for analysis and review, the transition from open to LA demonstrated a consistent decrease in postoperative pain, leading to a reduced need for opioid prescriptions. Analgesic strategies included the use of local anesthetics (lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine), spinal/epidural anesthesia, nerve blocks, and a multimodal approach with NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Studies demonstrated the efficacy of local anesthetics in reducing postoperative pain, prompting a shift toward non-opioid analgesics. The use of spinal/epidural anesthesia and nerve blocks further supported the trend of minimizing opioid prescriptions. While some variations in anesthetic approaches existed, overall, patients undergoing LA required fewer opioid doses, reflecting a positive shift in postoperative pain management. Patients undergoing LA experienced lower rates of readmission, reduced post-operative pain, better cosmetic outcomes, and shorter recovery times, contributing to a diminished demand for opioid medications. This review underscores the potential for non-opioid analgesic strategies in surgical contexts, aligning with the broader imperative to address the opioid epidemic and promote safer and more sustainable pain management practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.