Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344526›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Decoding Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: A Comprehensive Narrative Review Exploring Mechanics, Health Risks, Regulatory Challenges, and Public Health Imperatives.

Sankalp Yadav

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Sankalp YadavMedicine, Shri Madan Lal Khurana Chest Clinic, New Delhi, IND.
Madurai Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterpipe tobacco smoking, commonly known as hookah or shisha, has witnessed a surge in popularity globally, particularly among young adults. However, this activity is associated with several issues related to health. This comprehensive narrative review aims to provide a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and public health professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of waterpipe tobacco smoking and implement evidence-based strategies to address its challenges. The present article focuses on an in-depth analysis of the health risks associated with waterpipe tobacco smoking. Based on evidence from the current scientific literature, the review explores the impact of waterpipe smoking on respiratory health, cardiovascular outcomes, and the potential links to infectious diseases. Additionally, the review discusses the emerging evidence on the long-term health consequences, highlighting the need for continued research in this area. Also, it touches on the regulatory challenges surrounding waterpipe tobacco smoking, which were critically examined, emphasizing the gaps and inconsistencies in existing policies. Finally, the review underscores the public health imperatives necessitated by the rise of waterpipe tobacco smoking. The narrative concludes by proposing a holistic approach that integrates scientific evidence, regulatory frameworks, and public health initiatives to mitigate the growing impact of waterpipe tobacco smoking on population health.

Indexed as

hookah smokingpassive smokingshishasmoking tobaccowaterpipe tobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID38344526
PMCPMC10859125
OpenAlexW4390788703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.