ReviewCureus2024
Association Between Oral Microbiota and Oral Leukoplakia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunological Microenvironment Diversity in Homogeneous and Non-Homogeneous Oral Leukoplakia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Microbial dysbiosis and host-microbe interactions in proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: insights into carcinogenic potential.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- The potential role of genus Treponema in carcinogenesis with a focus on oral squamous cell carcinoma: a scoping review of the evidence.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Molecular Interplay Between Oral Microbiome and Oral Cancer Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Oral leukoplakia: still an enigmatic disorder.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2025Review
- Salivary Metabolomics Discloses Metabolite Signatures of Oral Leukoplakia with and Without Dysplasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Decoding oral leukoplakia: microbiome dysbiosis and inflammatory dynamics unveiled in a rat model.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Literature evidence suggests a significant gap in research exploring the association between the oral microbiota and leukoplakia. So, this review aimed to thoroughly assess the body of research and look at the connection between leukoplakia and the oral microbiome. Databases such as Pubmed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Cochrane Library were searched using MeSH keywords using a standard data extraction protocol that was designed to ensure comprehensive extraction of relevant information from the selected studies, adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Seven studies were selected that were relevant to this review's objectives. The findings indicate that patients with leukoplakia had a diverse oral microbiota compared to healthy controls. The connection between the oral microbiomes of leukoplakia patients and oral cancer cases was also found, indicating possible microbial profile similarities. By shedding light on particular microbial species and variations in the oral microbial flora of leukoplakia, the studies that were included in this review reveal possible biomarkers and provide a deeper knowledge of the disease mechanism. The considerable overlap between oral microbiomes in leukoplakia cases highlights the need for more research into common microbial indicators and the implications for diagnosis and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.