ReviewCureus2024
The Efficacy of Antihypertensive Drugs in Lowering Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Policosanol (sugarcane wax alcohols) 20 mg/day in Cuban Patients With Grade I Hypertension: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Policosanol (Sugarcane Wax Alcohols) 20 mg/Day in Cuban Prehypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicentre Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Trial
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Among Adults Aged 80 and Above: Findings From the Population-Based German Health Survey Gesundheit 65.International journal of hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. One of the main risk factors for cardiovascular events is hypertension. The use of antihypertensive drugs can protect against these events. It occurs directly through the control of hypertension and indirectly through other cardiovascular effects. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to assess the impact of various antihypertensive medications (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, etc.) on blood pressure and various cardiovascular outcomes. A thorough search was conducted using several online databases and search engines, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medline, Embase, and others. RCTs evaluating the impact of antihypertensive medications on BP and other cardiovascular events like coronary heart disease and stroke were included in this study. Included were studies detailing the use of antihypertensive medication in monotherapy. The meta-analysis was done using RevMan version 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Means and standard deviations were extracted for the continuous variables and events, and the total sample number was extracted for the dichotomous variables. This analysis encompassed a total of 18 RCTs of the elderly population. The data for each variable was extracted independently, and analysis was performed. Overall, systolic blood pressure (SBP) revealed an impact of -11.88, CI=95% (-20.56, -3.19). The diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed -5.41, CI=95% (-9.62, -1.20), myocardial infarction 0.92, CI=95% (0.82, 1.04), stroke 0.83, CI=95% (0.74, 0.94), and cardiovascular mortality 0.93, CI=95% (0.86, 1.00). Heterogeneity was present due to the variable sample size of the studies and other unidentified biases. In conclusion, there was a significant reduction in the elderly population's risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death when antihypertensive medications were taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.