Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344428›Full record

ArticleThe British and Irish orthoptic journal2024

UK Optometrists' Professional Learning Needs Toward Engaging with Myopia Control Interventions.

Wan Elhami Wan Omar, Fiona Cruickshank, Hema Radhakrishnan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British and Irish orthoptic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wan Elhami Wan OmarFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5387-9256
Fiona CruickshankFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, GB.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6661-4118
Hema RadhakrishnanFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, GB.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8898-2453
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the support that UK optometrists feel they require to facilitate their engagement with myopia control intervention. Methods: A self-administered online survey was distributed via QualtricsXM to practising optometrists in the UK via email lists and newsletters of local optical committees, social media, and optometric networks. Questions focussed on learning styles, training needs and barriers to learning. Results: Fifty-five respondents completed the survey. Forty-eight respondents answered the question on where they get information about myopia control and learning style, 79.2% indicated that conferences offering Conclusion: Optometrists felt they need training in various aspects of myopia management, from practical skills to assessing and fitting/prescribing appropriate myopia control interventions. They were also interested in learning more on EBP and clinical decision-making related to myopia control. To improve the uptake of myopia control among optometrists, various learning methods, especially online learning, and providing sufficient time for training are crucial.

Indexed as

learning needsmyopia controlmyopia managementoptometrists’ skills

Identifiers

PMID38344428
PMCPMC10854455
OpenAlexW4391605075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.