ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Governing Integrated Health and Social Care: An Analysis of Experiences in Three European Countries.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organizing Social Citizenship for People Living With Dementia: A Community Case Study.Dementia (London, England) · 2026Article
- Challenges of the general practitioner's role in integrated primary health care: a qualitative study of trainees in a reform-oriented network in Northern Italy.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Do subsidies reach the sick? Implementation challenges and equity implications of pharmaceutical subsidy reform in Iran: a qualitative study.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Explaining informal patient payments through gaps in governance - a comparative assessment of health system governance in three European countries.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- Are long-term care systems aligned with person-centered integrated care? Evidence from the Western Pacific.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Evaluating the role of community-based multi-disciplinary teams in England's Pioneer integrated health and social care programme: Setting the scene.Journal of health services research & policy · 2025Article
- Determinants influencing the implementation of community health management for cognitive impairment: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Collaborative networks in community-based health and social care services: insights from Blackpool and the Fylde Coast (United Kingdom).Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Co-producing and co-assessing a new service solution for enhancing health and social care integration: a participatory research protocol.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The digital transformation of nursing practice: an analysis of advanced IoT technologies and smart nursing systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Health resource allocation within the close-knit medical consortium after the Luohu healthcare reform in China: efficiency, productivity, and influencing factors.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Charting the Course Together: Municipal Top-Level Managers' Perspectives on Fostering Safe and Integrated Care for Older Adults Living at Home.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Floundering or Flourishing? Early Insights from the Inception of Integrated Care Systems in England.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Achieving greater health and social care integration is a policy priority in many countries, but challenges remain. We focused on governance and accountability for integrated care and explored arrangements that shape more integrated delivery models or systems in Italy, the Netherlands and Scotland. We also examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected existing governance arrangements. Design/methodology/approach: A case study approach involving document review and semi-structured interviews with 35 stakeholders in 10 study sites between February 2021 and April 2022. We used the Transparency, Accountability, Participation, Integrity and Capability (TAPIC) framework to guide our analytical enquiry. Findings: Study sites ranged from bottom-up voluntary agreements in the Netherlands to top-down mandated integration in Scotland. Interviews identified seven themes that were seen to have helped or hindered integration efforts locally. Participants described a disconnect between what national or regional governments aspire to achieve and their own efforts to implement this vision. This resulted in blurred, and sometimes contradictory, lines of accountability between the centre and local sites. Flexibility and time to allow for national policies to be adapted to local contexts, and engaged local leaders, were seen to be key to delivering the integration agenda. Health care, and in particular acute hospital care, was reported to dominate social care in terms of policies, resource allocation and national monitoring systems, thereby undermining better collaboration locally. The pandemic highlighted and exacerbated existing strengths and weaknesses but was not seen as a major disruptor to the overall vision for the health and social care system. Research limitations: We included a relatively small number of interviews per study site, limiting our ability to explore complexities within sites. Originality: This study highlights that governance is relatively neglected as a focus of attention in this context but addressing governance challenges is key for successful collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.