Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344427›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Governing Integrated Health and Social Care: An Analysis of Experiences in Three European Countries.

Josephine Exley, Rebecca Glover, Martha Mccarey, Sarah Reed, Anam Ahmed, Hubertus Vrijhoef, Tommaso Manacorda, Concetta Vaccaro, Francesco Longo, Ellen Stewart and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Josephine ExleyPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-0854
Rebecca GloverPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-9977
Martha MccareyThe Nuffield Trust, London, UK.
Sarah ReedThe Nuffield Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0329-9728
Anam AhmedPanaxea, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-262X
Hubertus VrijhoefPanaxea, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-4671
Tommaso ManacordaPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-4222
Concetta VaccaroFondazione CENSIS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-8392
Francesco LongoDepartment of Social and Political Sciences at UniversitàBocconi, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4082-9094
Ellen StewartSchool of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3013-1477
Nicholas MaysPolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-8466
Ellen NoltePolicy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-117X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Achieving greater health and social care integration is a policy priority in many countries, but challenges remain. We focused on governance and accountability for integrated care and explored arrangements that shape more integrated delivery models or systems in Italy, the Netherlands and Scotland. We also examined how the COVID-19 pandemic affected existing governance arrangements. Design/methodology/approach: A case study approach involving document review and semi-structured interviews with 35 stakeholders in 10 study sites between February 2021 and April 2022. We used the Transparency, Accountability, Participation, Integrity and Capability (TAPIC) framework to guide our analytical enquiry. Findings: Study sites ranged from bottom-up voluntary agreements in the Netherlands to top-down mandated integration in Scotland. Interviews identified seven themes that were seen to have helped or hindered integration efforts locally. Participants described a disconnect between what national or regional governments aspire to achieve and their own efforts to implement this vision. This resulted in blurred, and sometimes contradictory, lines of accountability between the centre and local sites. Flexibility and time to allow for national policies to be adapted to local contexts, and engaged local leaders, were seen to be key to delivering the integration agenda. Health care, and in particular acute hospital care, was reported to dominate social care in terms of policies, resource allocation and national monitoring systems, thereby undermining better collaboration locally. The pandemic highlighted and exacerbated existing strengths and weaknesses but was not seen as a major disruptor to the overall vision for the health and social care system. Research limitations: We included a relatively small number of interviews per study site, limiting our ability to explore complexities within sites. Originality: This study highlights that governance is relatively neglected as a focus of attention in this context but addressing governance challenges is key for successful collaboration.

Indexed as

comparative policy analysisgovernancehealth financinghealth system and services researchintegrated health and social care

Identifiers

PMID38344427
PMCPMC10854466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.