ArticleClinical case reports2024
Apraxia of speech due to the left postcentral gyrus lesion.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Children with lower language skill engage additional brain mechanisms in both hemispheres during sentence comprehension.Research square · 2025Article
- Cognitive and neuroanatomical assessment of alexia and agraphia in Japanese: implications for the European languages.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Dynamic Field Theory of Executive Function: Identifying Early Neurocognitive Markers.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · 2024Article
- Apraxia of speech due to the left postcentral gyrus lesion.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Key Clinical Message: Apraxia of speech (AOS) due to a postcentral infarction differs from conventional precentral AOS with respect to phonemic errors (phoneme substitution) which are more common than phonetic errors (phoneme distortion) and preserved accent and intonation. Abstract: Clinical features of apraxia of speech caused by lesions in the postcentral gyrus have not yet been elucidated. Here, we report a patient with this lesion and show how postcentral apraxia of speech differs from the hitherto known precentral apraxia of speech. A 54-year-old man developed Broca's aphasia with apraxia of speech that resolved into pure apraxia of speech within 3 weeks following infarction of the postcentral gyrus. The diagnosis of apraxia of speech was based on the patient's effortful, slow speech and inconsistent phonetic distortions with phonemic paraphasia. The Western Aphasia Battery was used to examine the patient's speech samples. Speech was recorded using a digital voice recorder and transcribed into a narrow transcription of the International Phonetic Alphabet. The error types were categorized phonologically. The results revealed that (a) phonemic errors (vowel and consonant substitutions, also known as phonemic paraphasia) were more common than phonetic errors (vowel and consonant distortions). Similar to conduction aphasia, phonemic errors were more pronounced in confrontation naming than in repetition, accompanied by self-correction, and (b) word accent and sentence intonation were preserved, although the speech was slow. These two features are characteristic of postcentral apraxia of speech, which can be differentiated from conventional precentral apraxia of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.