Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344267›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2024

Topical capsaicin 8% patch in peripheral neuropathic pain: Efficacy and quality of life.

Márcia Pitrez Santos, Francisco Lemos, Joana Gomes, José Manuel Romão, Dalila Veiga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Márcia Pitrez SantosMedicine Faculty, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6675-5418
Francisco LemosDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.
Joana GomesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António E.P.E., Porto, Portugal.
José Manuel RomãoMedicine Faculty, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Dalila VeigaMedicine Faculty, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar - University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de Santo António · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) is one of the most challenging diseases to treat with a significant negative impact on the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Capsaicin 8% patch has arisen in the last decades as an alternative to oral drugs in the treatment of PNP with fewer side effects and promising results in efficacy. Objectives: This work aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the topical application of capsaicin in PNP and its impact on patients' HRQoL based on the use of capsaicin in a tertiary hospital of Oporto. Methods: This study included 100 patients with localized PNP with poor pain control and without improvement with previous treatments that were treated at least once with an 8% capsaicin patch. Effectiveness on pain relief, number of treatments needed, safety and impact on HRQoL were assessed through a set of questionnaires. Results: Regarding the aetiology of PNP, 67.6% ( Conclusion: Capsaicin 8% patch is effective in PNP treatment at least in the short term. Repeated applications may be important for long-term analgesia. The low systemic dose and few side effects mean that the treatment is generally well tolerated by patients. Due to the analgesic effect, capsaicin can improve the HRQoL of patients with PNP.

Indexed as

Capsaicineffectivenessneuropathic painquality of lifesafety

Identifiers

PMID38344267
PMCPMC10851892
OpenAlexW4386629930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.