Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344213›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2024

Cell therapy for male sexual dysfunctions: systematic review and position statements from the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

Celeste Manfredi, Luca Boeri, Ioannis Sokolakis, Nicolò Schifano, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Esaú Fernández-Pascual, Andrea Sansone, Borja García-Gómez, Maarten Albersen, Giovanni Corona and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shaping the future of sexual medicine in Europe.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Celeste ManfrediUrology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Italy.
Luca BoeriDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan 20122, Italy.
Ioannis Sokolakis2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Nicolò SchifanoASST Sette Laghi-Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, Varese 21100, Italy.
Nikolaos PyrgidisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 80336, Germany.
Esaú Fernández-PascualLYX Institute of Urology, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid 28223, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2602-2617
Andrea SansoneChair of Endocrinology and Medical Sexology (ENDOSEX), Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-2843
Borja García-GómezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid 28041, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-3656
Maarten AlbersenDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Giovanni CoronaEndocrinology Unit, Azienda AUSL, Bologna 40123, Italy.
Javier Romero-OteroROC Clinic, Madrid 28010, Spain.
Mikkel FodeDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev 2730, Denmark.
ESSM Scientific Collaboration and Partnership (ESCAP)
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRAzienda USL di Bologna · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHM Hospitales · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESKU Leuven · BELMU Klinikum · DEOspedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi · ITRush University Medical Center · USUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cell therapy (CT) is a form of regenerative medicine under investigation for the management of male sexual dysfunction (MSD). Aim: We sought to perform a systematic review of published information on CT for MSD and provide an official position statements for the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Methods: A comprehensive bibliographic search on the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in February 2023. Articles were selected based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study design (PICOS) model if they included male patients (P) undergoing CT (I) with or without comparison with other treatments (C) and evaluated the impact of CT on sexual function (O). Quantitative data were reported as found in the original studies (S). Level of evidence and grade of recommendation according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine were assigned to each statement. Outcomes: Outcomes were determined based on assessment of erectile function, ejaculatory function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, and penile curvature. Results: A total of 19 studies and 421 patients were included. Most articles (n = 12, 63%) were case series, whereas a minority of papers (n = 6, 32%) had a comparative group; only 2 articles reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 article reported a post hoc analysis of RCTs. Most articles (16, 84%) investigated patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Improvements in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) or the IIEF 5-item version (IIEF-5) were found in 11/15 (73%) studies, with mean increases in IIEF-EF, mean IIEF-5, and median IIEF-EF between 8 and 14 points, 2 and 9 points, and 4.5 and 6 points, respectively. Two papers (20%) evaluated men with Peyronie's disease (PD). In both ot these articles penile curvature improvement and plaque volume reduction were described in all patients (n = 16, 100%). Objective measurements were performed in 1 study, which showed 10°-120° (15%-100%) curvature improvement and 90%-100% plaque reduction. Mild transient adverse events at the donor or administration sites were found in 7/16 (44%) papers on ED. Priapism was reported in one case (20%) and mild penile skin complications were reported in the majority of patients after CT for PD. No severe adverse events were described. Clinical Implications: Although high-quality evidence is lacking, CT appears to have potential benefits from application in patients with ED or PD. Strengths and Limitations: This report is to our knowledge the most comprehensive and up-to-date systematic review on the topic of CT for the management of MSD, including the position statements of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Overall the assessment of available studies demonstrated low quality and significant heterogeneity. Conclusion: Preliminary findings support potential efficacy and safety of CT in patients with ED or PD. Low-quality papers, high methodological heterogeneity, uncertainty about the magnitude of the beneficial effects, and lack of long-term data limit the available evidence.

Indexed as

erectile dysfunctionPeyronie’s diseaseregenerative medicinesexual dysfunctionstem cells

Identifiers

PMID38344213
PMCPMC10857898
OpenAlexW4392730736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.