Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344194›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024

LASSO-Based Identification of Risk Factors and Development of a Prediction Model for Sepsis Patients.

Chengying Hong, Yihan Xiong, Jinquan Xia, Wei Huang, Andi Xia, Shunyao Xu, Yuting Chen, Zhikun Xu, Huaisheng Chen, Zhongwei Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence to investigate metabolomics data for precision medicine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengying HongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Yihan XiongNeurology Department, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Jinquan XiaDepartment of Clinical Medical Research Center, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Wei HuangDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8569-5184
Andi XiaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Shunyao XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Yuting ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Zhikun XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Huaisheng ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518020, People's Republic of China.
Zhongwei ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
Jinan University · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to utilize LASSO regression (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Regression) to identify key variables in septic patients and develop a predictive model for intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Methods: We conducted a cohort consisting of septic patients admitted to the ICU between December 2016 and July 2019. The disease severity and laboratory index were analyzed using LASSO regression. The selected variables were then used to develop a model for predicting ICU mortality. AUCs of ROCs were applied to assess the prediction model, and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Calibration were also used to assess the actual and predicted values of the predictive model. Results: A total of 1733 septic patients were included, among of whom 382 (22%) died during ICU stay. Ten variables, namely mechanical ventilation (MV) requirement, hemofiltration (HF) requirement, norepinephrine (NE) requirement, septicemia, multiple drug-resistance infection (MDR), thrombocytopenia, hematocrit, red-cell deviation width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV), C-reactive protein (CRP), and antithrombin (AT) III, showed the strongest association with sepsis-related mortality according to LASSO regression. When these variables were combined into a predictive model, the area under the curve (AUC) was found to be 0.801. The AUC of the validation group was 0.791. The specificity of the model was as high as 0.953. Within the probability range of 0.25 to 0.90, the predictive performance of the model surpassed that of individual predictors within the cohort. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a predictive model incorporating the variables of MV requirement, HF requirement, NE requirement, septicemia, MDR, thrombocytopenia, HCT, RDW-CV, CRP, and AT III exhibiting an 80% likelihood of predicting ICU mortality in sepsis and demonstrates high accuracy.

Indexed as

ICULASSO regressionmortalitypredictive modelsepsis

Identifiers

PMID38344194
PMCPMC10859107
OpenAlexW4391610152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.