ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2024
In vivo three-dimensional kinematic comparison of normal knees between flexion and extension activities.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of weight-bearing status on kinematics and cruciate ligament force in normal knees.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objective: Normal knee kinematics during flexion and extension activities over the whole range of motion remains unknown. This study aimed to clarify in vivo kinematics during knee flexion and extension activities of normal knees by comparing continuous flexion and extension activities up to a high flexion angle. Methods: Twenty knees of 10 Japanese volunteers were enrolled in this study. Each volunteer performed a continuous squatting motion under fluoroscopy, and a two- or three-dimensional registration technique was used. Rotation and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral sides of the femur relative to the tibia at each flexion angle were evaluated. Results: Femoral external rotation was significantly smaller from 10° to 40° flexion during extension activities than during flexion activities. However, the femoral external rotation was larger from 120° to 130° flexion during extension activities than during flexion activities. From 10° to 60° of flexion, the medial side was significantly more posteriorly located during extension activities than during flexion activities. Furthermore, the lateral side was significantly more posteriorly located at 130° of flexion during extension activities than during flexion activities. Conclusion: In vivo kinematics of normal knees during extension activities differ from those during flexion activities in early and high flexion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.