Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344094›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2024

Subfascial drains are safe and effective in preventing postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks after intradural spine tumor surgery.

Julie Mayeku, Esteban Quiceno, Christina Cannata, Giovanni Barbagli, Amna Hussein, Nikhil Dholaria, Michael Prim, Ali A Baaj

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drain versus no drain after intradural spine surgery: a 10-year multicenter study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie MayekuDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Esteban QuicenoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Christina CannataDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Giovanni BarbagliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Amna HusseinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Nikhil DholariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix/Banner University Medical Center, Arizona, United States.
Michael PrimDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Ali A BaajDepartment of Spine Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.
Banner - University Medical Center Tucson · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delayed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are a known complication following intradural spinal tumor surgery. The placement of subfascial drains in these patients undergoing requisite intradural surgery is controversial. Here, we demonstrated that placing a subfascial drain on partial suction for 48 h, with early ambulation, proved to be safe and effective in preventing early/delayed recurrent CSF fistulas. Methods: Medical records of 17 patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumors over a 30-month were reviewed. All patients underwent intradural tumor resection followed by primary dural closure, placement of Gelfoam in a non-compressive fashion, application of fibrin sealant, and utilization of a subfascial drain placed on partial suction for 48 h postoperatively. Patients are mobilized the morning following surgery. We tracked the incidence of postoperative recurrent CSF leaks, over drainage, infection, wound dehiscence, pseudo meningocele formation, and the reoperation rate. Results: For the 17 patients, our programmed average utilization of subfascial drains was 48 h. Moreover, the average drain output was 165 mL. Over the 1-year follow-up period, no patient developed a recurrent early/ delayed CSF leak, there were no wound complications, nor need for revision surgery. Conclusion: Utilizing subfascial drains on partial suction following the resection of intradural spinal tumors with primary dural closure proved to be safe and effective.

Indexed as

Intentional durotomyIntradural spinal tumorsPostoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakSubfascial drains

Identifiers

PMID38344094
PMCPMC10858779
OpenAlexW4390829454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.