Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38344042›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2024

Identification of Patients with Early HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence.

Peter A Fasching, Hans Kreipe, Lucia Del Mastro, Eva Ciruelos, Gilles Freyer, Agnieszka Korfel, Nadia Chouaki, Clemens Stoffregen, Francisco Sapunar, David Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Therapy of early breast cancer: current status and perspectives.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter A FaschingComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans KreipeInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lucia Del MastroS. S. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Eva CiruelosSOLTI Breast Cancer Research Group, Barcelona, Spain.
Gilles FreyerOncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Agnieszka KorfelLilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Nadia ChouakiEli Lilly and Company, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Clemens StoffregenLilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.
Francisco SapunarEli Lilly and Company Limited, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.
David CameronUniversity of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer incidence has increased in the last two decades and, simultaneously, survival has improved due to earlier detection and improved treatment options. Despite this improvement, locoregional recurrences and distant metastases occur in up to 10 and 30% of women diagnosed with early breast cancer, respectively. Around 70% of breast cancers are hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), and associated with a persistent risk of relapse up to 20 years after diagnosis/initial treatment. We conducted a narrative review by combining PubMed searches with our clinical experience to describe patient characteristics, biomarkers, and genomic profiling tools available to clinicians for the identification of patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence and to provide recommendations to classify patients into recurrence risk categories. National and international treatment guidelines are also summarised. Accurate assessment of the risk of recurrence in these patients is crucial as the predicted risk guides treatment decisions; imprecise estimations can result in over- or undertreatment, with either scenario having negative consequences for patients. Multiple prognostic tools and factors are recommended for early breast cancer, and no single test provides accurate prognosis in isolation. Since no single test can provide accurate prognosis in isolation, a combination of tools should be used. Risk thresholds are important to guide optimised and balanced therapeutic decisions in HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. However, prognostic assessment should be performed on a case-by-case basis, making patient-specific prognostic approaches essential to avoid over- or undertreatment.

Indexed as

early breast cancerHER2−HR+prediction of riskrisk of recurrence

Identifiers

PMID38344042
PMCPMC10853032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.