Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343689›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Patient's Experiences of Long-Term Monitoring Clinics from the Patient's Perspective.

Blossom Bell, Stacie Thursby, Helen Limbrick, Katherine Swainston

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Blossom BellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8993-7021
Stacie ThursbyNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Rake Lane, Tyne and Wear, North Shields, UK.
Helen LimbrickSchool of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, UK.
Katherine SwainstonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNorth Tyneside General Hospital · GBTeesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to synthesize all qualitative evidence on the experiences of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients attending long-term monitoring clinics from their perspective. A systematic search of the literature was undertaken across 8 databases. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program was used to evaluate each study's quality. Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research was employed to assess confidence in each finding. Three themes from 4 qualitative studies were identified relating to patients' experiences, "[It's] important to maintain a good relationship with the nurses and doctors," "There's always the thing about the logistics," and "Once you have cancer, you're always thinking do I have it again?". The findings suggest that HSCT patients' experiences of long-term follow-up care clinics are influenced by the patient-provider relationship and the logistical set-up of monitoring practices, and weakly connected with fear of cancer recurrence. Future research is needed to understand the impact of each finding of this review, specifically in relation to patients' country of residence to gain a greater understanding of their monitoring support needs.

Indexed as

cancer recurrencelong-term monitoringpatients’ experiencesstem cell transplant

Identifiers

PMID38343689
PMCPMC10854386
OpenAlexW4391695683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.