Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343602›Full record

ArticleComputers and electronics in agriculture2024

ClimMob: Software to support experimental citizen science in agriculture.

Carlos Quirós, Kauê de Sousa, Jonathan Steinke, Brandon Madriz, Marie-Angélique Laporte, Elizabeth Arnaud, Rhys Manners, Berta Ortiz-Crespo, Anna Müller, Jacob van Etten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Estimating on-farm genotypic performance and variability using ranking data.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlos QuirósDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Kauê de SousaDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Jonathan SteinkeDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Brandon MadrizMrBot Software Solutions, Cartago, Costa Rica.
Marie-Angélique LaporteDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Elizabeth ArnaudDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Rhys MannersInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kigali, Rwanda.
Berta Ortiz-CrespoDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Anna MüllerDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.
Jacob van EttenDigital Inclusion, Bioversity International, Montpellier, France.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009649Gates Foundation INV-031561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental citizen science offers new ways to organize on-farm testing of crop varieties and other agronomic options. Its implementation at scale requires software that streamlines the process of experimental design, data collection and analysis, so that different organizations can support trials. This article considers ClimMob software developed to facilitate implementing experimental citizen science in agriculture. We describe the software design process, including our initial design choices, the architecture and functionality of ClimMob, and the methodology used for incorporating user feedback. Initial design choices were guided by the need to shape a workflow that is feasible for farmers and relevant for farmers, breeders and other decision-makers. Workflow and software concepts were developed concurrently. The resulting approach supported by ClimMob is triadic comparisons of technology options (tricot), which allows farmers to make simple comparisons between crop varieties or other agricultural technologies tested on farms. The software was built using Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE), to allow for a flexible, modular design of software that is easy to maintain. Source is open-source and built on existing components that generally have a broad user community, to ensure their continuity in the future. Key components include Open Data Kit, ODK Tools, PyUtilib Component Architecture. The design of experiments and data analysis is done through R packages, which are all available on CRAN. Constant user feedback and short communication lines between the development teams and users was crucial in the development process. Development will continue to further improve user experience, expand data collection methods and media channels, ensure integration with other systems, and to further improve the support for data-driven decision-making.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingDecentralized experimentsDigital inclusionTricot approach

Identifiers

PMID38343602
PMCPMC10853689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.