Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343567›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Nutrients or resin? - The relationship between resin and food foraging in stingless bees.

Gemma Nydia Villagómez, Alexander Keller, Claus Rasmussen, Pablo Lozano, David A Donoso, Nico Blüthgen, Sara Diana Leonhardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gemma Nydia VillagómezDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology University of Würzburg, Biocenter Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-7908
Alexander KellerFaculty of Biology, Cellular and Organismic Networks LMU Munich Planegg-Martinsried Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-3634
Claus RasmussenDepartment of Agroecology Aarhus University Slagelse Denmark.
Pablo LozanoUniversidad Estatal Amazónica Puyo Ecuador.
David A DonosoGrupo de Investigación en Ecología y Evolución en los Trópicos-EETROP Universidad de Las Américas Quito Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-1457
Nico BlüthgenDepartment of Biology, Ecological Networks Technical University of Darmstadt Darmstadt Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6349-4528
Sara Diana LeonhardtTUM School of Life Sciences, Plant-Insect-Interactions Technical University of Munich Freising Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-9569
Technische Universität Darmstadt · DEAarhus University · DKTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversidad Estatal Amazónica · ECUniversity of Würzburg · DEUrologische Klinik München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stingless bees are important pollinators in tropical forests. Yet, we know little about their foraging behavior (e.g., their nutritional requirements or their floral sources visited for resource collection). Many stingless bees not only depend vitally on pollen and nectar for food but also on resin for nest building and/or defense. However, it is unclear whether the large effort devoted to collecting resin as a non-food resource by certain stingless bees affects their foraging behavior. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed differences in foraging patterns (i.e., foraging activity, proportion of collected resources, and specialization in plants visited) and resource nutritional composition (i.e., sucrose amount in nectar and amino acids in pollen) of seven different stingless bee species (eleven wild colonies) in north-western Ecuador with a particular focus on the role of resin collection. We found that species with a high resin intake tended to be more active than species with a low resin intake. The foragers per minute invested for pollen collection were similar across all species. Sucrose intake per minute differed between some species but was not affected by increased resin intake. Interestingly, high and low resin collectors partly differed in the plants visited for pollen collection. Pollen amino acid profiles largely, but not completely, overlapped between the two resin collection groups. Our findings show that the foraging patterns and plant choices of stingless bees may vary depending on their resin intake, highlighting the need for more research focusing on resin collection and use by stingless bees.

Indexed as

DNA metabarcodinginteraction networksMeliponininectarresource collection

Identifiers

PMID38343567
PMCPMC10853648
OpenAlexW4391709437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.