ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Spectrum and outcome of the use of noninvasive ventilation in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit: A single-center experience.
Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Shallow Breathing Index as a Predictor of Extubation Outcomes After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Postextubation Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Children.Respiratory care · 2025Review
- A Review of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients: Risk Factors and Implications.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) frequently uses noninvasive ventilation (NIV). There are several reasons for its use, including prophylactic use right after the patient has been extubated. It is also used when patients are experiencing acute respiratory failure due to either cardiac or noncardiac reasons but are still able to maintain their airways. The objective of this study was to understand the spectrum of use of NIV following congenital cardiac surgery and analyze the outcome. Methods and Results: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a 14-bed PCICU, reviewing data from August 2019 to August 2022. Among 1750 congenital cardiac surgeries, 523 patients (29.9%) received NIV. The median age of the population was 2.5 months. Factors such as higher Risk-Adjusted Classification for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 category, longer intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass time, and aortic cross-clamp time were associated with increased NIV use. Preoperative ventilator needs, infections, genetic syndromes, diaphragmatic paralysis, high vasoactive inotrope score (VIS) in the first 24 h, neonatal age, and weight <5 kg were independently associated with increased NIV need. The NIV group had a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay compared to non-NIV patients. The success rate of NIV was 84%, with 440 successful cases and 83 failures. The mortality rate in the success and failure groups was not significantly different (5.27% vs. 6.0%). Conclusions: NIV is widely used in PCICU, but it is associated with longer ICU stays. It proves beneficial after congenital cardiac surgery, especially for patients with specific risk factors. However, NIV may not directly impact mortality rates, suggesting that other factors contribute to patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.