Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343467›Full record

ReviewProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2024

The use of cannabinoids in palliating cancer-related symptoms: a narrative review.

Jess Hatfield, Krishna Suthar, Tricia A Meyer, Lucas Wong

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jess HatfieldTexas A&M School of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-7138
Krishna SutharBaylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas, USA.
Tricia A MeyerBaylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas, USA.
Lucas WongBaylor Scott and White, Temple, Texas, USA.
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple · USTemple College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite uncertain efficacy, cannabinoids and derived products are becoming increasingly used in the field of palliative care for oncologic patients. Cannabinoids chiefly include psychoactive tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and nonpsychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). Use of and research interest in THC, CBD, and combination THC/CBD products have increased in recent years, particularly after the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 made cannabis plants with <0.3% THC no longer controlled substances, and many states recently legalized THC use altogether. To provide an updated review of this topic, we reviewed randomized controlled trials with >50 patients studying cannabinoid use in cancer patients. We found that THC products, including THC and THC/CBD combination products, are helpful for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting. CBD products were not helpful for this indication. For most other studied indications (anorexia/cachexia, mood, general global symptoms), there was no convincing evidence to support widespread cannabinoid use in cancer symptom management. The evidence for treating cancer-related pain with THC/CBD products is somewhat conflicting. We conclude that, apart from using THC products to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting, cannabinoid products should not be routinely recommended for cancer supportive care. Further research in the form of large randomized controlled trials is warranted in this area.

Indexed as

Cannabidiolcannabinoidspalliative caretetrahydrocannabinol

Identifiers

PMID38343467
PMCPMC10857674
OpenAlexW4390825457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.