ReviewSpine surgery and related research2024
Effects of Scapular Interventions on Pain and Disability in Subjects with Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal neck pain is the fourth common cause of disability worldwide. Scapula dysfunction can subsequently lead to neck pain. Previous literature could not establish the effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercises on neck pain due to the different definitions used for exercise in different studies. There is a need for quality evidence examining the effectiveness of scapular interventions on pain and disability in patients with neck pain. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, OVID, and PEDro were searched from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2022. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials that focused on scapular interventions and other active strategies in the management of neck pain. The following outcomes were assessed: pain, disability, and quality of life. PEDro scale was used to assess the risk of bias and the data pooled was analyzed using standardized mean difference. Results: The 5 trials included in the review assessed (116 participants) the effects of scapular interventions in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Risk of bias for one study was low and that for the others was moderate. The meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the combined effect of neck and scapula interventions and only neck interventions group (Standardized mean difference -1.51, 95% CI [-2.79, -0.23], z=2.32, p=0.02). On assessing the effect of scapula interventions on disability, the results revealed that there was no significant (p=0.40) impact. Conclusion: Moderate quality evidence was found for the combined effect of scapular and neck interventions in reducing pain in patients with neck pain. However, it was not effective in improving the disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.