Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343406›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2024

Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Endoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Comparison with Conservative Treatment.

Koshi Nambu, Hitoaki Numata, Junya Yoshitani, Kensyo Suzuki, Naoki Takemoto, Hiroaki Kimura, Nobuhiko Komine, Kenichi Goshima, Yu Mikami, Yu Hatsuchi and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of postoperative cauda equina clumping on recovery after biportal endoscopic decompression for severe lumbar stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Koshi NambuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Hitoaki NumataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Junya YoshitaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Kensyo SuzukiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Naoki TakemotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital, Takaoka, Japan.
Hiroaki KimuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan.
Nobuhiko KomineDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asanogawa General Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kenichi GoshimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Munehiro Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Yu MikamiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Imizu Municipal Hospital, Imizu, Japan.
Yu HatsuchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyama City Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Takashi IshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keyaki Clinic, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takashi HiguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Red Cross Kanazawa Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Norihiro OkuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
Kazuki AsaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokuriku Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.
Sei MorinagaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Saiseikai Takaoka Hospital · JPAsanogawa General Hospital · JPFukui-ken Saiseikai Hospital · JPHokuriku University · JPJapanese Red Cross Kanazawa Hospital · JPKanazawa University · JPMaizuru Municipal Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JPToyama City Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the 10-year clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare the radiographic changes in patients who underwent this procedure with those who underwent conservative therapy at 10-year follow-up. Methods: Between April 2007 and April 2010, 347 consecutive patients with DS and evidence of LSS underwent conservative treatment first from 2 to 4 weeks. The 114 patients who failed conservative treatment were then treated surgically by endoscope-assisted MIS decompression. Of them, 91 patients were followed for more than 10 years (group S), and 146 of the 233 patients treated conservatively were followed for more than 10 years (group C). Clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted MIS decompression were assessed using the Short Form Health Survey-36 score (SF-36), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and the neurological leg symptoms of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA score). Radiographic changes of the two groups were assessed by %slip, dynamic %slip, range of motion (ROM), and the height of the disc (DH) on plain radiographs. Results: Significant improvements in clinical outcomes on the SF-36, RDQ, and neurological leg symptoms of the JOA were observed. Radiographic assessment did not show significant differences in the assessed items between the two groups at baseline and after last treatment. Both groups had significantly decreased ROM and DH. Conclusions: The 10-year clinical outcomes of endoscope-assisted MIS decompression for DS were generally good. Furthermore, on radiographic comparison, the progress of spondylolisthesis after this procedure was virtually the same as in the natural course of the disease at 10-year follow-up.

Indexed as

10-year follow-upConservative therapyEndoscope-assisted minimally invasive surgical decompressionLumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

Identifiers

PMID38343406
PMCPMC10853622
OpenAlexW4387566921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.