Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38343260›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Lightweight Attentive Graph Neural Network with Conditional Random Field for Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.

Jiaoju Wang, Jiewen Luo, Jiehui Liang, Yangbo Cao, Jing Feng, Lingjie Tan, Zhengcheng Wang, Jingming Li, Alphonse Houssou Hounye, Muzhou Hou and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaoju Wang *School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, China.
Jiewen Luo *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Jiehui LiangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Yangbo CaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Jing FengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Lingjie TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Zhengcheng WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750021, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.
Jingming LiSchool of Civil Engineeringand Architecture, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, 473061, Henan, China.
Alphonse Houssou HounyeSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, China.
Muzhou HouSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, China. hmzw@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6658-2187
Jinshen HeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. jinshen.he@hotmail.com.
Central South University · CNNanyang Normal University · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province China under Grants 2022JJ30673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are prevalent orthopedic sports injuries and are difficult to precisely classify. Previous works have demonstrated the ability of deep learning (DL) to provide support for clinicians in ACL tear classification scenarios, but it requires a large quantity of labeled samples and incurs a high computational expense. This study aims to overcome the challenges brought by small and imbalanced data and achieve fast and accurate ACL tear classification based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee. We propose a lightweight attentive graph neural network (GNN) with a conditional random field (CRF), named the ACGNN, to classify ACL ruptures in knee MR images. A metric-based meta-learning strategy is introduced to conduct independent testing through multiple node classification tasks. We design a lightweight feature embedding network using a feature-based knowledge distillation method to extract features from the given images. Then, GNN layers are used to find the dependencies between samples and complete the classification process. The CRF is incorporated into each GNN layer to refine the affinities. To mitigate oversmoothing and overfitting issues, we apply self-boosting attention, node attention, and memory attention for graph initialization, node updating, and correlation across graph layers, respectively. Experiments demonstrated that our model provided excellent performance on both oblique coronal data and sagittal data with accuracies of 92.94% and 91.92%, respectively. Notably, our proposed method exhibited comparable performance to that of orthopedic surgeons during an internal clinical validation. This work shows the potential of our method to advance ACL diagnosis and facilitates the development of computer-aided diagnosis methods for use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningFemaleGraph Neural NetworksHumansMaleAnterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)Attention moduleConditional Random Field (CRF)Few-shot classificationGraph Neural Network (GNN)

Identifiers

PMID38343260
PMCPMC11031558
OpenAlexW4390904101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.